Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27483038›Full record

Trial reportMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2016

Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and height loss: findings from the Women's Health Initiative Calcium and Vitamin D clinical trial.

Carolyn J Crandall, Aaron K Aragaki, Meryl S LeBoff, Wenjun Li, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Jane A Cauley, Karen L Margolis, JoAnn E Manson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adaptation to microgravity, deconditioning, and countermeasures.The journal of physiological sciences : JPS · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carolyn J Crandall1Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA 2WHI Clinical Coordinating Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 3Endocrine, Skeletal Health and Osteoporosis Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 4Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 5Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 6Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 7HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN 8Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Aaron K Aragaki
Meryl S LeBoff
Wenjun Li
Jean Wactawski-Wende
Jane A Cauley
Karen L Margolis
JoAnn E Manson

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100046CNIA NIH HHS HHSN271201100004CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the associations between calcium + vitamin D supplementation (vs placebo) and height loss in 36,282 participants of the Women's Health Initiative Calcium and Vitamin D trial.

methodsPost hoc analysis of data from a double-blind randomized controlled trial of 1,000 mg of elemental calcium as calcium carbonate with 400 IU of vitamin D3 daily (CaD) or placebo in postmenopausal women at 40 US clinical centers. Height was measured annually (mean follow-up 5.9 y) with a stadiometer.

resultsAverage height loss was 1.28 mm/y among participants assigned to CaD versus 1.26 mm/y for women assigned to placebo (P = 0.35). Effect modification of the CaD intervention was not observed by age, race/ethnicity, or baseline intake of calcium or vitamin D. Randomization to the CaD group did not reduce the risk of clinical height loss (loss of ≥1.5 inches [3.8 cm]: hazard ratio (95% CI) = 1.00 (0.81, 1.23). A strong association (P < 0.001) was observed between age group and height loss. When we censored follow-up data in participants who became nonadherent to study pills, the results were similar to those of our primary analysis.

conclusionsCompared with placebo, the CaD supplement used in this trial did not prevent height loss in healthy postmenopausal women.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAgedBody HeightCalcium CarbonateCalcium, DietaryCholecalciferolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostmenopauseProportional Hazards ModelsVitaminsCalcium CarbonateCalcium, DietaryCholecalciferolVitamins

Identifiers

PMID27483038
PMCPMC5118123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.