Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27482895›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Nomogram Incorporating CD44v6 and Clinicopathological Factors to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis for Early Gastric Cancer.

Bang Wool Eom, Jungnam Joo, Boram Park, Min Jung Jo, Seung Ho Choi, Soo-Jeong Cho, Keun Won Ryu, Young-Woo Kim, Myeong-Cherl Kook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Predictive value of E-cadherin and EpCAM for detection of metastatic lymph node in early gastric cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bang Wool EomDepartment of Medicine, Yonsei University Graduate School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jungnam JooCancer Biostatistics Branch, Research Institute for National Cancer Control & evaluation, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Boram ParkCancer Biostatistics Branch, Research Institute for National Cancer Control & evaluation, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Min Jung JoGastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Seung Ho ChoiDepartment of Medicine, Yonsei University Graduate School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo-Jeong ChoGastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Keun Won RyuGastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Young-Woo KimGastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Myeong-Cherl KookGastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
National Cancer Center · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment strategy for early gastric cancer depends on the probability of lymph node metastasis. The aim of this study is to develop a nomogram predicting lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer using clinicopathological factors and biomarkers.

methodsA literature review was performed to identify biomarkers related to lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Seven markers were selected and immunohistochemistry was performed in 336 early gastric cancer tissues. Based on the multivariable analysis, a prediction model including clinicopatholgical factors and biomarkers was developed, and benefit of adding biomarkers was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve and net reclassification improvement. Functional study in gastric cancer cell line was performed to evaluate mechanism of biomarker.

resultsOf the seven biomarkers studied, α1 catenin and CD44v6 were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. A conventional prediction model, including tumor size, histological type, lymphatic blood vessel invasion, and depth of invasion, was developed. Then, a new prediction model including both clinicopathological factors and CD44v6 was developed. Net reclassification improvement analysis revealed a significant improvement of predictive performance by the addition of CD44v6, and a similar result was shown in the internal validation using bootstrapping. Prediction nomograms were then constructed based on these models. In the functional study, CD44v6 was revealed to affect cell proliferation, migration and invasion.

conclusionsOverexpression of CD44v6 was a significant predictor of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer. The prediction nomograms incorporating CD44v6 can be useful to determine treatment plans in patients with early gastric cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsPrognosisStomachStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCD44v6 antigenHyaluronan Receptors

Identifiers

PMID27482895
PMCPMC4970798
OpenAlexW2497371205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.