Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27482374›Full record

ArticleEvoDevo2016

In silico evo-devo: reconstructing stages in the evolution of animal segmentation.

Renske M A Vroomans, Paulien Hogeweg, Kirsten H W J Ten Tusscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EvoDevo, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modelling the evolution of novelty: a review.Essays in biochemistry · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ediacaran developmental biology.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Quantitative study of developmental biology confirmsProceedings. Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Renske M A VroomansTheoretical Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1353-797X
Paulien HogewegTheoretical Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kirsten H W J Ten TusscherTheoretical Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evolution of animal segmentation is a major research focus within the field of evolutionary-developmental biology. Most studied segmented animals generate their segments in a repetitive, anterior-to-posterior fashion coordinated with the extension of the body axis from a posterior growth zone. In the current study we ask which selection pressures and ordering of evolutionary events may have contributed to the evolution of this specific segmentation mode.

resultsTo answer this question we extend a previous in silico simulation model of the evolution of segmentation by allowing the tissue growth pattern to freely evolve. We then determine the likelihood of evolving oscillatory sequential segmentation combined with posterior growth under various conditions, such as the presence or absence of a posterior morphogen gradient or selection for determinate growth. We find that posterior growth with sequential segmentation is the predominant outcome of our simulations only if a posterior morphogen gradient is assumed to have already evolved and selection for determinate growth occurs secondarily. Otherwise, an alternative segmentation mechanism dominates, in which divisions occur in large bursts through the entire tissue and all segments are created simultaneously.

conclusionsOur study suggests that the ancestry of a posterior signalling centre has played an important role in the evolution of sequential segmentation. In addition, it suggests that determinate growth evolved secondarily, after the evolution of posterior growth. More generally, we demonstrate the potential of evo-devo simulation models that allow us to vary conditions as well as the onset of selection pressures to infer a likely order of evolutionary innovations.

Indexed as

Axis extensionBilaterian evolutionDeterminate growthIn silico evolutionPosterior signallingSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID27482374
PMCPMC4968448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.