Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27482257›Full record

ArticleKorean circulation journal2016

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Transient and Persistent No Reflow Phenomena following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Min Chul Kim, Jae Yeong Cho, Hae Chang Jeong, Ki Hong Lee, Keun Ho Park, Doo Sun Sim, Nam Sik Yoon, Hyun Joo Youn, Kye Hun Kim, Young Joon Hong and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean circulation journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Do ANGPTL-4 and galectin-3 reflect the severity of coronary artery disease?Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min Chul KimDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Jae Yeong ChoDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Hae Chang JeongDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Ki Hong LeeDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Keun Ho ParkDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Doo Sun SimDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Nam Sik YoonDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Hyun Joo YounDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Kye Hun KimDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Young Joon HongDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Hyung Wook ParkDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Ju Han KimDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Myung Ho JeongDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Jeong Gwan ChoDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Jong Chun ParkDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Ki-Bae SeungDepartment of Cardiology, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kiyuk ChangDepartment of Cardiology, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Youngkeun AhnDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Chonnam National University Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThere is limited information on the transient or persistent no reflow phenomenon in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). SUBJECTS AND

methodsThe study analyzed 4329 patients with AMI from a Korean multicenter registry who underwent PCI using coronary stents (2668 ST-elevation and 1661 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction [MI] patients): 4071 patients without any no reflow, 213 with transient no reflow (no reflow with final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] flow grade 3), and 45 with persistent no reflow (no reflow with final TIMI flow grade≤2). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during 3-year follow-up. We also analyzed the incidence of cardiac mortality, non-fatal MI, re-hospitalization due to heart failure, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis.

resultsThe persistent no reflow group was associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-3.65, p=0.028) and cardiac mortality (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.54-6.95, p=0.002) compared with the normal reflow group. Transient no reflow increased all-cause mortality only when compared with normal reflow group (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.11-2.24, p=0.010). When comparing transient and persistent no reflow, persistent no reflow was associated with increased all-cause mortality (46.7 vs. 24.4%, log rank p=0.033).

conclusionThe persistent no reflow phenomenon was associated with a poor in-hospital outcome and increased long-term mortality mainly driven by increased cardiac mortality compared to the transient no reflow phenomenon or normal reflow.

Indexed as

Myocardial infarctionNo-reflow phenomenonPercutaneous coronary interventions

Identifiers

PMID27482257
PMCPMC4965427
OpenAlexW2477452944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.