ReviewKorean circulation journal2016
Women and Ischemic Heart Disease: Recognition, Diagnosis and Management.
Review in Korean circulation journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing disparity in mortality rates for ischemic heart disease using CDC-WONDER database: A retrospective analysis.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Article
- Addressing Gender Disparities in Cardiovascular Care: Guideline-Oriented PCI for Women and the Hua-Mulan Conundrum.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Differences in coronary angiographic findings and outcomes between men and postmenopausal women with stable chest pain.Coronary artery disease · 2024Article
- Egg consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease: a PERSIAN cohort-based study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Effects of Age, Metabolic and Socioeconomic Factors on Cardiovascular Risk among Saudi Women: A Subgroup Analysis from the Heart Health Promotion Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Gender disparities in prevalence by diagnostic criteria, treatment and mortality of newly diagnosed acute myocardial infarction in Korean adults.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A longitudinal linkage study of occupation and ischaemic heart disease in the general and Māori populations of New Zealand.PloS one · 2022Article
- Complement Initiation Varies by Sex in Intestinal Ischemia Reperfusion Injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Eicosanoid production varies by sex in mesenteric ischemia reperfusion injury.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2020Article
- Gender differences in the presentation of chest pain in obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the Korean Women's Chest Pain Registry.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2020Article
- Women with Stable Angina Pectoris and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Closer to a Diagnosis.European cardiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is one of the most frequent causes of death in both males and females throughout the world. However, women exhibit a greater symptom burden, more functional disability, and a higher prevalence of nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to men when evaluated for signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia. This paradoxical sex difference appears to be linked to a sex-specific pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia including coronary microvascular dysfunction, a component of the 'Yentl Syndrome'. Accordingly, the term ischemic heart disease (IHD) is more appropriate for a discussion specific to women rather than CAD or coronary heart disease. Following the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Heart Truth/American Heart Association, Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation and guideline campaigns, the cardiovascular mortality in women has been decreased, although significant gender gaps in clinical outcomes still exist. Women less likely undergo testing, yet guidelines indicate that symptomatic women at intermediate to high IHD risk should have further test (e.g. exercise treadmill test or stress imaging) for myocardial ischemia and prognosis. Further, women have suboptimal use of evidence-based guideline therapies compared with men with and without obstructive CAD. Anti-anginal and anti-atherosclerotic strategies are effective for symptom and ischemia management in women with evidence of ischemia and nonobstructive CAD, although more female-specific study is needed. IHD guidelines are not "cardiac catheterization" based but related to evidence of "myocardial ischemia and angina". A simplified approach to IHD management with ABCs (aspirin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-renin blockers, beta blockers, cholesterol management and statin) should be used and can help to increases adherence to guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.