ArticleNeural regeneration research2016
Graphene platform for neural regenerative medicine.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cutting-edge Approach of Carbon Nanostructures: Targeted Drug Delivery to Central Nervous System.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Advances in Alzheimer's disease control approaches via carbon nanotubes.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Nanomaterials-incorporated hydrogels for 3D bioprinting technology.Nano convergence · 2023Review
- Recent advances in bioelectronics chemistry.Chemical Society reviews · 2020Review
- Graphene and its derivatives as biomedical materials: future prospects and challenges.Interface focus · 2018Review
- The Efficacy of Graphene Foams for Culturing Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Differentiation into Dopaminergic Neurons.Stem cells international · 2018Article
- Neural Stem Cell Plasticity: Advantages in Therapy for the Injured Central Nervous System.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.