Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27482101›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Constraint, natural selection, and the evolution of human body form.

Kristen R R Savell, Benjamin M Auerbach, Charles C Roseman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The obstetrical dilemma hypothesis: there's life in the old dog yet.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Human adaptation over the past 40,000 years.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2020
    Review
  12. Genetic contributions to variation in human stature in prehistoric Europe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Nasal airflow simulations suggest convergent adaptation in Neanderthals and modern humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristen R R SavellDepartment of Anthropology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996; ksavell@vols.utk.edu.
Benjamin M AuerbachDepartment of Anthropology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996;
Charles C RosemanDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4; Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61802.
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in body form among human groups is structured by a blend of natural selection driven by local climatic conditions and random genetic drift. However, attempts to test ecogeographic hypotheses have not distinguished between adaptive traits (i.e., those that evolved as a result of selection) and those that evolved as a correlated response to selection on other traits (i.e., nonadaptive traits), complicating our understanding of the relationship between climate and morphological distinctions among populations. Here, we use evolutionary quantitative methods to test if traits previously identified as supporting ecogeographic hypotheses were actually adaptive by estimating the force of selection on individual traits needed to drive among-group differentiation. Our results show that not all associations between trait means and latitude were caused by selection acting directly on each individual trait. Although radial and tibial length and biiliac and femoral head breadth show signs of responses to directional selection matching ecogeographic hypotheses, the femur was subject to little or no directional selection despite having shorter values by latitude. Additionally, in contradiction to ecogeographic hypotheses, the humerus was under directional selection for longer values by latitude. Responses to directional selection in the tibia and radius induced a nonadaptive correlated response in the humerus that overwhelmed its own trait-specific response to selection. This result emphasizes that mean differences between groups are not good indicators of which traits are adaptations in the absence of information about covariation among characteristics.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHuman BodyQuantitative Trait, HeritableSelection, GeneticBody ConstitutionClimateGene FlowGenetic DriftHumansMalePhylogeographyRacial GroupsAllen's ruleBergmann's ruleecogeographic variationevolutionary constraintsnatural selection

Identifiers

PMID27482101
PMCPMC5003290
OpenAlexW2475566521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.