Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27481793›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

The Trichoptera barcode initiative: a strategy for generating a species-level Tree of Life.

Xin Zhou, Paul B Frandsen, Ralph W Holzenthal, Clare R Beet, Kristi R Bennett, Roger J Blahnik, Núria Bonada, David Cartwright, Suvdtsetseg Chuluunbat, Graeme V Cocks and 27 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A New Species and Molecular Characterization of the GenusAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Trichoptera of Canada.ZooKeys · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Xin ZhouBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China xinzhoucaddis@icloud.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1407-7952
Paul B FrandsenOffice of Research Information Services, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA.
Ralph W HolzenthalDepartment of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Avenue, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Clare R BeetSchool of Science, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Kristi R BennettSchool of Science, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Roger J BlahnikDepartment of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Avenue, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Núria BonadaGrup de Recerca Freshwater Ecology and Management (FEM), Departament d'Ecologia, Facultat de Biologia, Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal, 643, 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
David Cartwright13 Brolga Crescent, Wandana Heights, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Suvdtsetseg ChuluunbatDepartment of Biology, Mongolian National University of Education, 3rd Palace, Beijing Street, Ulaanbaatar 14191, Mongolia.
Graeme V Cocks44 Marks Street, Hermit Park, Queensland 4812, Australia.
Gemma E CollinsSchool of Science, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Jeremy deWaardCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1.
John DeanEnvironment Protection Authority Victoria, Ernest Jones Drive, Macleod 3085, Australia.
Oliver S FlintDepartment of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA.
Axel HausmannSNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany.
Lars HendrichSNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany.
Monika HessBüro H2-Ökologische Gutachten, Hess+Heckes GbR, Rumfordstraße 42, 80469 München, Germany.
Ian D HoggSchool of Science, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Boris C KondratieffDepartment of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, 1177 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Hans MalickyBiologische Station Lunz, Austrian Academy of Sciences, A-3293 Lunz am see, Austria.
Megan A MiltonCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1.
Jérôme MorinièreSNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany.
John C MorseDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, PO Box 340310, Clemson, SC 29634-0310, USA.
François Ngera MwangiCentre de Recherche en Sciences Naturelles Lwiro, P.O D.S Bukavu, D. R. Congo.
Steffen U PaulsSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
María Razo GonzalezUnidad Multidisciplinaria de Docencia e Investigación, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexcio, Facultad de Ciencias, Campus Juriquilla, Querétaro, 76230, México.
Aki RinneFinnish Environment Institute, Merikasarminkatu 8 D, 00160 Helsinki, Finland.
Jason L RobinsonIllinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1816 S. Oak Street, MC 652, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Juha SalokannelAquatic Insects Expert Group of Finland, Siikinkatu 13, 33710, Tampere, Finland.
Michael ShackletonMurray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, La Trobe University, 133 McKoy Street, Wodonga, Victoria 3691, Australia.
Brian SmithNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box, 11115, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Alexandros StamatakisScientific Computing Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), 69118 Heidelberg, Germany Institute for Theoretical Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, 35 D-69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ros StClairEnvironment Protection Authority Victoria, Ernest Jones Drive, Macleod 3085, Australia.
Jessica A ThomasBioArch, Environment Building, Department of Biology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Carmen Zamora-MuñozDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, C/Severo Ochoa s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Tanja ZiesmannZoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK)/Zentrum fu¨r Molekulare Biodiversitätsforschung (ZMB), Bonn 5 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Karl M KjerDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California-Davis, 1282 Academic Surge, Davis, CA 95616, USA kkjer@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7370-9617

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA barcoding was intended as a means to provide species-level identifications through associating DNA sequences from unknown specimens to those from curated reference specimens. Although barcodes were not designed for phylogenetics, they can be beneficial to the completion of the Tree of Life. The barcode database for Trichoptera is relatively comprehensive, with data from every family, approximately two-thirds of the genera, and one-third of the described species. Most Trichoptera, as with most of life's species, have never been subjected to any formal phylogenetic analysis. Here, we present a phylogeny with over 16 000 unique haplotypes as a working hypothesis that can be updated as our estimates improve. We suggest a strategy of implementing constrained tree searches, which allow larger datasets to dictate the backbone phylogeny, while the barcode data fill out the tips of the tree. We also discuss how this phylogeny could be used to focus taxonomic attention on ambiguous species boundaries and hidden biodiversity. We suggest that systematists continue to differentiate between 'Barcode Index Numbers' (BINs) and 'species' that have been formally described. Each has utility, but they are not synonyms. We highlight examples of integrative taxonomy, using both barcodes and morphology for species description.This article is part of the themed issue 'From DNA barcodes to biomes'.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicPhylogenyAnimalsBiodiversityHaplotypesInsectaSequence Analysis, DNAcaddisflyDNA barcodesintegrative taxonomyphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID27481793
PMCPMC4971193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.