Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27481791›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Advancing taxonomy and bioinventories with DNA barcodes.

Scott E Miller, Axel Hausmann, Winnie Hallwachs, Daniel H Janzen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Constructing a lower-bound estimate of the global number of insect species on a hyperdiverse empirical foundation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott E MillerNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA millers@si.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4138-1378
Axel HausmannSNSB-Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0358-9928
Winnie HallwachsDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5166-809X
Daniel H JanzenDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7335-5107

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We use three examples-field and ecology-based inventories in Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea and a museum and taxonomic-based inventory of the moth family Geometridae-to demonstrate the use of DNA barcoding (a short sequence of the mitochondrial COI gene) in biodiversity inventories, from facilitating workflows of identification of freshly collected specimens from the field, to describing the overall diversity of megadiverse taxa from museum collections, and most importantly linking the fresh specimens, the general museum collections and historic type specimens. The process also flushes out unexpected sibling species hiding under long-applied scientific names, thereby clarifying and parsing previously mixed collateral data. The Barcode of Life Database has matured to an essential interactive platform for the multi-authored and multi-process collaboration. The BIN system of creating and tracking DNA sequence-based clusters as proxies for species has become a powerful way around some parts of the 'taxonomic impediment', especially in entomology, by providing fast but testable and tractable species hypotheses, tools for visualizing the distribution of those in time and space and an interim naming system for communication.This article is part of the themed issue 'From DNA barcodes to biomes'.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicAnimalsClassificationConservation of Natural ResourcesCosta RicaMothsPapua New Guineabiodiversitycytochrome c oxidase IDNA barcodinginterim taxonomyLepidoptera

Identifiers

PMID27481791
PMCPMC4971191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.