Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27481784›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Barcoding the largest animals on Earth: ongoing challenges and molecular solutions in the taxonomic identification of ancient cetaceans.

Camilla Speller, Youri van den Hurk, Anne Charpentier, Ana Rodrigues, Armelle Gardeisen, Barbara Wilkens, Krista McGrath, Keri Rowsell, Luke Spindler, Matthew Collins and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Paleoproteomics.Chemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  5. New Holocene grey whale (Royal Society open science · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. From writing to reading the encyclopedia of life.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Camilla SpellerBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, Environment Building, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, UK camilla.speller@york.ac.uk.
Youri van den HurkInstitute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK.
Anne CharpentierCEFE UMR 5175, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, EPHE - CNRS, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Ana RodriguesCEFE UMR 5175, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, EPHE - CNRS, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Armelle GardeisenArchéologie des Sociétés Méditerranéennes, UMR 5140, CNRS, Labex Archimede IA-ANR-11-LABX-0032-01, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, 34970 Lattes, France.
Barbara WilkensDipartimento di Scienze della Natura e del Territorio, Università degli Studi, Sassari, Italy.
Krista McGrathBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, Environment Building, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, UK.
Keri RowsellBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, Environment Building, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, UK.
Luke SpindlerBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, Environment Building, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, UK.
Matthew CollinsBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, Environment Building, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, UK.
Michael HofreiterInstitute of Biochemistry and Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany michael.hofreiter@uni-potsdam.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0441-4705
University of York · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMuseum of London Archaeology · GBUniversity of Potsdam · DEUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few centuries, many cetacean species have witnessed dramatic global declines due to industrial overharvesting and other anthropogenic influences, and thus are key targets for conservation. Whale bones recovered from archaeological and palaeontological contexts can provide essential baseline information on the past geographical distribution and abundance of species required for developing informed conservation policies. Here we review the challenges with identifying whale bones through traditional anatomical methods, as well as the opportunities provided by new molecular analyses. Through a case study focused on the North Sea, we demonstrate how the utility of this (pre)historic data is currently limited by a lack of accurate taxonomic information for the majority of ancient cetacean remains. We then discuss current opportunities presented by molecular identification methods such as DNA barcoding and collagen peptide mass fingerprinting (zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry), and highlight the importance of molecular identifications in assessing ancient species' distributions through a case study focused on the Mediterranean. We conclude by considering high-throughput molecular approaches such as hybridization capture followed by next-generation sequencing as cost-effective approaches for enhancing the ecological informativeness of these ancient sample sets.This article is part of the themed issue 'From DNA barcodes to biomes'.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicAnimalsArchaeologyBiodiversityCetaceaClassificationCollagenHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNorth SeaCollagenancient DNAarchaeozoologycetaceanscollagen peptide mass fingerprintingspecies identificationzooarchaeology by mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID27481784
PMCPMC4971184
OpenAlexW2491119389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.