Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27481782›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

A new way to contemplate Darwin's tangled bank: how DNA barcodes are reconnecting biodiversity science and biomonitoring.

Mehrdad Hajibabaei, Donald J Baird, Nicole A Fahner, Robert Beiko, G Brian Golding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards global insect biomonitoring with frugal methods.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DNA metabarcoding reveals metacommunity dynamics in a threatened boreal wetland wilderness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. From writing to reading the encyclopedia of life.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehrdad HajibabaeiCentre for Biodiversity Genomics @ Biodiversity Institute of Ontario and Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1 mhajibab@uoguelph.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8859-7977
Donald J BairdEnvironment and Climate Change Canada @ Canadian Rivers Institute, University of New Brunswick, 10 Bailey Drive, PO Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 5A3.
Nicole A FahnerCentre for Biodiversity Genomics @ Biodiversity Institute of Ontario and Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1.
Robert BeikoFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, 6050 University Avenue, PO Box 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
G Brian GoldingDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Encompassing the breadth of biodiversity in biomonitoring programmes has been frustrated by an inability to simultaneously identify large numbers of species accurately and in a timely fashion. Biomonitoring infers the state of an ecosystem from samples collected and identified using the best available taxonomic knowledge. The advent of DNA barcoding has now given way to the extraction of bulk DNA from mixed samples of organisms in environmental samples through the development of high-throughput sequencing (HTS). This DNA metabarcoding approach allows an unprecedented view of the true breadth and depth of biodiversity, but its adoption poses two important challenges. First, bioinformatics techniques must simultaneously perform complex analyses of large datasets and translate the results of these analyses to a range of users. Second, the insights gained from HTS need to be amalgamated with concepts such as Linnaean taxonomy and indicator species, which are less comprehensive but more intuitive. It is clear that we are moving beyond proof-of-concept studies to address the challenge of implementation of this new approach for environmental monitoring and regulation. Interpreting Darwin's 'tangled bank' through a DNA lens is now a reality, but the question remains: how can this information be generated and used reliably, and how does it relate to accepted norms in ecosystem study?This article is part of the themed issue 'From DNA barcodes to biomes'.

Indexed as

BiodiversityComputational BiologyConservation of Natural ResourcesDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEnvironmental MonitoringbiodiversityDNA barcodingenvironmentgenomicsphylogeneticstaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID27481782
PMCPMC4971182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.