ArticleAIDS research and human retroviruses2017
Short Communication: Low False Recent Rate of Limiting Antigen-Avidity Assay Combined with HIV-1 RNA Data in Botswana.
Article in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of HIV Recency Assays for HIV Incidence Estimation and Other Surveillance Use Cases: Systematic Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Pooled it
- Cross-sectional estimates revealed high HIV incidence in Botswana rural communities in the era of successful ART scale-up in 2013-2015.PloS one · 2018Trial
- HIV-1 infection recency among individuals newly diagnosed with HIV in Greater Gaborone, Botswana.AIDS (London, England) · 2025Article
- Immunological markers for identifying recent HIV infection in North-West India.The Indian journal of medical research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cross-sectional estimation of HIV incidence could misclassify some established or chronic HIV infections as recent. Usually long-term nonprogressors, elite and viremic controllers, and individuals on ART contribute to misclassification. Local data on the false recent rate (FRR) could minimize misclassification during estimation of HIV incidence. To improve monitoring of HIV incidence, we estimated local FRR in Botswana. A total of 1,036 specimens from individuals infected for at least 1.5-2 years were sampled between 2004 and 2009 and tested using the limiting antigen (LAg)-avidity assay using a cutoff of 1.5 normalized optical density units. The FRR was 0.97% (10/1,036; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-1.77). Four samples had HIV-1 RNA >1,000 cps/ml, giving an adjusted FRR of 0.39% (4/1,036; 95% CI 0.11-0.99). A combination of LAg and HIV-1 RNA load data resulted in FRR below 1% in the Botswana population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.