Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27481360›Full record

GuidelineVaccine2016

Guideline for collection, analysis and presentation of safety data in clinical trials of vaccines in pregnant women.

Christine E Jones, Flor M Munoz, Hans M L Spiegel, Ulrich Heininger, Patrick L F Zuber, Kathryn M Edwards, Philipp Lambach, Pieter Neels, Katrin S Kohl, Jane Gidudu and 9 more

Abstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Vaccine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Christine E JonesPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, UK.
Flor M MunozBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Hans M L SpiegelHenry Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Ulrich HeiningerUniversity of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Patrick L F ZuberSafety and Vigilance (SAV), Regulation of Medicines and other Health Technologies (RHT), Department of Essential Medicines and Health Products (EMP), Health Systems and Innovation (HIS), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kathryn M EdwardsVanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Philipp LambachInitiative for Vaccine Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pieter NeelsInternational Alliance of Biological Standardization, IABS-EU, Lyon, France.
Katrin S KohlCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jane GiduduGlobal Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, CDC, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Steven HirschfeldEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
James M OleskeDivision of Pediatrics Allergy, Immunology & Infectious Diseases, Rutgers, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States.
Najwa Khuri-BulosInfectious Disease and Vaccine Center, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Jorgen BauwensBrighton Collaboration Foundation, Switzerland.
Linda O EckertUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sonali KochharGlobal Healthcare Consulting, India.
Jan BonhoefferUniversity of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Paul T HeathPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, UK. Electronic address: contact@brightoncollaboration.org.
Brighton Collaboration Immunization in Pregnancy Working Group

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination during pregnancy is increasingly being used as an effective approach for protecting both young infants and their mothers from serious infections. Drawing conclusions from published studies in this area can be difficult because of the inability to compare vaccine trial results across different studies and settings due to the heterogeneity in the definitions of terms used to assess the safety of vaccines in pregnancy and the data collected in such studies. The guidelines proposed in this document have been developed to harmonize safety data collection in all phases of clinical trials of vaccines in pregnant women and apply to data from the mother, fetus and infant. Guidelines on the prioritization of the data to be collected is also provided to allow applicability in various geographic, cultural and resource settings, including high, middle and low-income countries.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPregnancyFemaleHumansInfantPregnancy Complications, InfectiousStatistics as TopicVaccinationVaccinesVaccinesAdverse eventClinical trialsGuidelinesImmunizationPregnancySafetyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID27481360
PMCPMC5572188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.