ReviewThe American journal of gastroenterology2016
Endoscopic Pancreas Fluid Collection: Methods and Relevance for Clinical Care and Translational Science.
Review in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Academic Pancreas Centers of Excellence: Guidance from a multidisciplinary chronic pancreatitis working group at PancreasFest.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]Guideline
- Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Biomarkers for High-Risk Individuals: Insights From the PRECEDE Consortium.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Cell-Free Tumor DNA Detection-Based Liquid Biopsy of Plasma and Bile in Patients with Various Pancreatic Neoplasms.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- AGA-PancreasFest Joint Symposium on Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency.Gastro hep advances · 2023Review
- Current clinical opinion on CFTR dysfunction and patient risk of pancreatitis: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Article
- Secretin-Enhanced MRCP: How and Why-AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2021Review
- Review
- Methylated DNA in Pancreatic Juice Distinguishes Patients With Pancreatic Cancer From Controls.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2020Article
- Diagnostic potential of hypermethylation of the cysteine dioxygenase 1 gene (CDO1) promoter DNA in pancreatic cancer.Cancer science · 2019Observational
- Assessment of Exocrine Function of Pancreas Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2019Article
- Total pancreatectomy for recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis: a critical review of patient selection criteria.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Complications of Chronic Pancreatitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017Review
- Chronic Pancreatitis: Current Status and Challenges for Prevention and Treatment.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017Review
- Diagnosing Chronic Pancreatitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017Review
- Laser Capture Microdissection of Pancreatic Acinar Cells to Identify Proteomic Alterations in a Murine Model of Caerulein-Induced Pancreatitis.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic secretions have an important role in the regulation of a normal nutritional state but can be altered owing to a variety of pathophysiological mechanisms in the context of exocrine pancreatic disease. The development of an endoscopic technique for collection of pancreatic fluid, termed endoscopic pancreatic function testing, has led to improved understanding of these alterations and is particularly helpful to characterize chronic pancreatitis. In addition, investigators have found endoscopically collected pancreatic fluid to be a valuable biofluid for the purposes of translational science. Techniques such as proteomic, cytokine, genetic mutation, DNA methylation, and microRNA analyses, among others, can be utilized to gain a better understanding of the molecular characteristics of chronic pancreatitis and other pancreatic diseases. Endoscopic collection of pancreatic fluid is safe and relatively straightforward, permitting opportunities for longitudinal analysis of these translational markers throughout the course of disease. This manuscript summarizes our current knowledge of pancreatic fluid, with an emphasis on proper techniques for sample collection and handling, its clinical utility, and preliminary observations in translational science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.