Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27480976›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2017

Prostate cancer bone metastases on staging prostate MRI: prevalence and clinical features associated with their diagnosis.

Hebert Alberto Vargas, Rachel Schor-Bardach, Niamh Long, Anna N Kirzner, Jane D Cunningham, Debra A Goldman, Chaya S Moskowitz, Ramon E Sosa, Evis Sala, David M Panicek and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Impact ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hebert Alberto VargasDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. vargasah@mskcc.org.
Rachel Schor-BardachDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Niamh LongDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Anna N KirznerDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Jane D CunninghamDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Debra A GoldmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Chaya S MoskowitzDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Ramon E SosaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Evis SalaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
David M PanicekDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Hedvig HricakDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBone lesions on prostate MRI often raise concern about metastases. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of bone metastases on staging prostate MRI and evaluate associations between their MRI features and clinical/pathologic characteristics.

methodsRetrospective, IRB-approved study of 3765 patients undergoing prostate MRI for newly diagnosed PCa between 2000 and 2014. The reference standard to calculate the prevalence of bone metastases was bone biopsy and/or ≥1-year follow-up after MRI. In a subsample of 228 patients, the MRI characteristics of bone lesions were recorded by two radiologists independently. Associations between MRI and clinical/pathologic findings, including National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk categories, were calculated.

results57/3765 patients (1.5%, 95% CI 1.2-2.0%) had bone metastases. No patient with NCCN low-risk PCa (Gleason < 7, PSA < 10 ng/mL, cT1-2a) had bone metastases. In the subsample, ≥1 bone lesion was present on MRI in 74% (95% CI 0.67-0.79) and 72% (95% CI 0.66-0.78) of patients (R1 and R2). Larger lesion diameter (OR 1.33/1.19; p < 0.001 for both readers) and the absence of intralesional fat (OR 0.07/0.11; p = 0.004/0.002 for R1/R2) were significantly associated with bone metastases.

conclusionBone lesions are common in prostate MRI, but only rarely represent metastases. MRI should be interpreted in the context of clinical features that influence the likelihood of metastatic disease.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyBone NeoplasmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrevalenceProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesBone metastasesDetectionImagingMRIProstate cancerStaging

Identifiers

PMID27480976
PMCPMC5247358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.