Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27480942›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2016

Putting patient participation into practice in pediatrics-results from a qualitative study in pediatric oncology.

Katharina Maria Ruhe, Tenzin Wangmo, Eva De Clercq, Domnita Oana Badarau, Marc Ansari, Thomas Kühne, Felix Niggli, Bernice Simone Elger, Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group (SPOG)

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Role of Patients and Parents in Pediatric Drug Development.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. ADOLESCENT PATIENTS AND THE CLINICAL DECISION ABOUT THEIR HEALTH.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2019
    Review
  20. Palliative care in Swiss pediatric oncology settings: a retrospective analysis of medical records.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina Maria RuheInstitute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Tenzin WangmoInstitute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland. Tenzin.Wangmo@unibas.ch.
Eva De ClercqInstitute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Domnita Oana BadarauInstitute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Marc AnsariDepartment of Pediatrics, Oncology and Haematology Unit, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Thomas KühneDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Haematology, University Children's Hospital of both Basel (UKBB), Basel, Switzerland.
Felix NiggliDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bernice Simone ElgerInstitute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group (SPOG)
University of Basel · CHUniversity Children’s Hospital Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAdequate participation of children and adolescents in their healthcare is a value underlined by several professional associations. However, little guidance exists as to how this principle can be successfully translated into practice. A total of 52 semi-structured interviews were carried out with 19 parents, 17 children, and 16 pediatric oncologists. Questions pertained to participants' experiences with patient participation in communication and decision-making. Applied thematic analysis was used to identify themes with regard to participation. Three main themes were identified: (a) modes of participation that captured the different ways in which children and adolescents were involved in their healthcare; (b) regulating participation, that is, regulatory mechanisms that allowed children, parents, and oncologists to adapt patient involvement in communication and decision-making; and (c) other factors that influenced patient participation. This last theme included aspects that had an overall impact on how children participated. Patient participation in pediatrics is a complex issue and physicians face considerable challenges in facilitating adequate involvement of children and adolescents in this setting. Nonetheless, they occupy a central role in creating room for choice and guiding parents in involving their child.

conclusionAdequate training of professionals to successfully translate the principle of patient participation into practice is required. WHAT IS KNOWN: •Adequate participation of pediatric patients in communication and decision-making is recommended by professional guidelines but little guidance exists as to how to translate it into practice. What is New: •The strategies used by physicians, parents, and patients to achieve participation are complex and serve to both enable and restrict children's and adolescents' involvement.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMedical OncologyPediatricsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsParent-Child RelationsParentsPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentsChildrenOncologyParticipationPediatricsPractice

Identifiers

PMID27480942
OpenAlexW2499464761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.