Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27480783›Full record

ReviewHerz2016

[Percutaneus coronary interventions for ostial lesions].

J Wöhrle, S Markovic

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Outcomes after Additional Dynamic RenalJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J WöhrleKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland. jochen.woehrle@uniklinik-ulm.de.
S MarkovicKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An ostial lesion is defined as a lesion near to the ostium (≤3 mm) and is characterized by a rigid fibrotic texture with pronounced sclerosis associated with a very high tendency to recoil. Under certain circumstances this may lead to a modest primary interventional result accompanied by a higher complication rate and in particular a higher rate of restenosis. Ostial lesions of the right coronary artery in particular represent a greater challenge for percutaneous interventions with a higher rate of restenosis despite the introduction of various new techniques. In contrast ostial stenosis of the left main trunk shows very good results after percutaneous interventions and implantation of drug-eluting stents. The indications for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of an ostial lesion correspond to the indications for treatment of all other lesions. The article gives an overview of the experiences and recommendations with respect to the diagnostics and interventional therapy of ostial lesions.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsDrug-Eluting StentsEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPreoperative CareTreatment OutcomeCoronary vesselsDrug-eluting stentsLesion preparationOstial lesionPercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.