ReviewJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2016
On the study of microbial transcriptomes using second- and third-generation sequencing technologies.
Review in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiological changes and full-length transcriptome of Artemisia sphaerocephala in response to drought stress.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Article
- TPX2 upregulates MMP13 to promote the progression of lipopolysaccharide-induced osteoarthritis.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Gut Microbiota in Children with Hand Foot and Mouth Disease on 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.Current microbiology · 2023Article
- Full-length transcriptome sequencing reveals the molecular mechanism of potato seedlings responding to low-temperature.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Nanopore sequencing of RNA and cDNA molecules inRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- A chromosome-scale genome assembly of a diploid alfalfa, the progenitor of autotetraploid alfalfa.Horticulture research · 2020Article
- Taxonomy and systematics of plant probiotic bacteria in the genomic era.AIMS microbiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Second-generation sequencing technologies transformed the study of microbial transcriptomes. They helped reveal the transcription start sites and antisense transcripts of microbial species, improving the microbial genome annotation. Quantification of genome-wide gene expression levels allowed for functional studies of microbial research. Ever-evolving sequencing technologies are reshaping approaches to studying microbial transcriptomes. Recently, Oxford Nanopore Technologies delivered a sequencing platform called MinION, a third-generation sequencing technology, to the research community. We expect it to be the next sequencing technology that enables breakthroughs in life science fields. The studies of microbial transcriptomes will be no exception. In this paper, we review microbial transcriptomics studies using second- generation sequencing technology. We also discuss the prospect of microbial transcriptomics studies with thirdgeneration sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27480632What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.