Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27480577›Full record

SynthesisHealth services research2017

Medicare Part D's Effects on Drug Utilization and Out-of-Pocket Costs: A Systematic Review.

Young Joo Park, Erika G Martin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Descriptive Study of HIV Patients Highly Adherent to Antiretroviral.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Young Joo ParkRockefeller College of Public Affairs & Policy, University at Albany-State University of New York, Albany, NY.
Erika G MartinRockefeller College of Public Affairs & Policy, University at Albany-State University of New York, Albany, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo update a past systematic review on whether Medicare Part D changed drug utilization and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs overall and within subpopulations, and to identify evidence gaps. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingPublished and gray literature from 2010 to 2015 meeting prespecified screening criteria, including having a comparison group, and utilization or OOP cost outcomes. STUDY

designWe conducted a systematic literature review with a quality assessment. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsFor each study, we extracted information on study design, data sources, analytic methods, outcomes, and limitations. Because outcome measures vary across studies, we did a qualitative synthesis rather than meta-analysis. PRINCIPAL

findingsSixty-five studies met screening criteria. Overall, Medicare Part D enrollees have increased drug utilization and decreased OOP costs, but coverage gaps limit the program's impact. Beneficiaries whose insurance becomes more generous after enrollment had disproportionately increased drug utilization and decreased OOP costs. Outcomes among dual-eligibles were mixed.

conclusionsThere is strong evidence on how Medicare Part D and the donut hole coverage gap affect utilization and OOP costs, but weak evidence on how effects vary among dual-eligibles or across diseases. Findings suggest that the Affordable Care Act's provisions to expand coverage and reduce the donut hole should improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedBenzodiazepinesDrug UtilizationFinancing, PersonalHumansInappropriate PrescribingMedicaidMedicare Part DUnited StatesBenzodiazepinescoverage gapdrug utilizationMedicare Part Dout-of-pocket costssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27480577
PMCPMC5583296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.