Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27480531›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2016

Deep genome sequencing and variation analysis of 13 inbred mouse strains defines candidate phenotypic alleles, private variation and homozygous truncating mutations.

Anthony G Doran, Kim Wong, Jonathan Flint, David J Adams, Kent W Hunter, Thomas M Keane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anthony G DoranWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1HH, UK.
Kim WongWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1HH, UK.
Jonathan FlintThe Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK.
David J AdamsWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1HH, UK.
Kent W HunterLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. hunterk@mail.nih.gov.
Thomas M KeaneWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1HH, UK. tk2@sanger.ac.uk.
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBCancer Genetics (United States) · USCentre for Human Genetics · GB

Funding

Genetic Modifiers of Intitiation and Progression of Mammary CancerZIABC011255 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HUNTER, KENT WILLIAM · 2010 to 2025
$33.2M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M000281/1Cancer Research UK 13031Medical Research Council MR/L007428/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Mouse Genomes Project is an ongoing collaborative effort to sequence the genomes of the common laboratory mouse strains. In 2011, the initial analysis of sequence variation across 17 strains found 56.7 M unique single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 8.8 M indels. We carry out deep sequencing of 13 additional inbred strains (BUB/BnJ, C57BL/10J, C57BR/cdJ, C58/J, DBA/1J, I/LnJ, KK/HiJ, MOLF/EiJ, NZB/B1NJ, NZW/LacJ, RF/J, SEA/GnJ and ST/bJ), cataloguing molecular variation within and across the strains. These strains include important models for immune response, leukaemia, age-related hearing loss and rheumatoid arthritis. We now have several examples of fully sequenced closely related strains that are divergent for several disease phenotypes.

resultsApproximately 27.4 M unique SNPs and 5 M indels are identified across these strains compared to the C57BL/6 J reference genome (GRCm38). The amount of variation found in the inbred laboratory mouse genome has increased to 71 M SNPs and 12 M indels. We investigate the genetic basis of highly penetrant cancer susceptibility in RF/J finding private novel missense mutations in DNA damage repair and highly cancer associated genes. We use two highly related strains (DBA/1J and DBA/2J) to investigate the genetic basis of collagen-induced arthritis susceptibility.

conclusionsThis paper significantly expands the catalogue of fully sequenced laboratory mouse strains and now contains several examples of highly genetically similar strains with divergent phenotypes. We show how studying private missense mutations can lead to insights into the genetic mechanism for a highly penetrant phenotype.

Indexed as

GenomeAllelesAnimalsBase SequenceChromosome MappingDNA DamageDNA RepairHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHomozygoteINDEL MutationMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMutation, MissensePolymorphism, Single NucleotidearthritisBiological pathwaysCancerDiseaseGenomic variationLaboratory mouseMouse genomesSequencing

Identifiers

PMID27480531
PMCPMC4968449
OpenAlexW2953218747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.