Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2016
Post-exercise blood flow restriction attenuates muscle hypertrophy.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validity of ultrasonography-derived predictions for estimating skeletal muscle volume: a systematic literature review.BMC medical imaging · 2021Pooled it
- Ischemia-Reperfusion Intervention: From Enhancements in Exercise Performance to Accelerated Performance Recovery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Blood flow restriction late in recovery after heavy resistance exercise hampers muscle recuperation.European journal of applied physiology · 2018Trial
- The effects of blood flow restriction combined with resistance training on lower limb strength, muscle hypertrophy, jumping ability, and sprint speed in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- The effects of blood flow restriction training on post activation potentiation and fatigue level: systematic review with meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Considerations for Sex-Cognizant Research in Exercise Biology and Medicine.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Review
- Effects of Training with Blood Flow Restriction on Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of exercise science · 2022Review
- Do metabolites that are produced during resistance exercise enhance muscle hypertrophy?European journal of applied physiology · 2017Review
- Post-exercise blood flow restriction attenuates hyperemia similarly in males and females.European journal of applied physiology · 2017Article
- Training to Fatigue: The Answer for Standardization When Assessing Muscle Hypertrophy?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeApplying blood flow restriction during low-load resistance training has been shown to augment muscle hypertrophy which has been attributed to metabolic accumulation. It remains unknown, however, whether metabolites can augment muscle growth when maintained post-exercise.
methodsThirteen untrained individuals (6 males and 7 females) performed 24 training sessions. The control arm performed one set of elbow flexion (70 % 1RM) to volitional fatigue, while the experimental arm performed the same protocol immediately followed by 3 min of blood flow restriction (70 % arterial occlusion). Muscle growth (ultrasound) was measured at 50, 60, and 70 % of the distance between the lateral epicondyle and acromion process.
resultsBoth conditions completed the same exercise volume [3678 (95 % CI 2962, 4393) vs. 3638 kg (95 % CI 2854, 4423)]. There was a condition by time interaction (p = 0.031) demonstrating an attenuation of muscle growth at the 60 % site in the experimental [pre 3.1 (95 % CI 2.8, 3.5), post 3.1 (95 % CI 2.7, 3.5) cm] vs. control [pre 3.1 (95 % CI 2.6, 3.6), post 3.3 (95 % CI 2.8, 3.7) cm] condition. Muscle growth at the 50 % and 70 % sites was similar at the group level, although there were attenuations at the individual level. Exploratory analyses of pre-post mean (95 % CI) changes in muscle thickness suggested that this attenuation in the experimental condition occurred only in females [50 % site 0.0 (-0.2, 0.0) cm; 60 % site -0.1 (-0.3, 0.0) cm; 70 % site 0.0 (-0.1, 0.1) cm].
conclusionsThe application of blood flow restriction post high-load training did not augment muscle growth for either sex, and appeared to attenuate muscle growth among females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.