ArticleHaematologica2016
Geriatric assessment in multiple myeloma patients: validation of the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) score and comparison with other common comorbidity scores.
Article in Haematologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The prevalence and outcomes of frail older adults in clinical trials in multiple myeloma: A systematic review.Blood cancer journal · 2023Pooled it
- Geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review.Haematologica · 2020Pooled it
- Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018Guideline
- Trial
- Bortezomib-based induction, high-dose melphalan and lenalidomide maintenance in myeloma up to 70 years of age.Leukemia · 2021Trial
- Pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for elderly patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A study of the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP-164 study).American journal of hematology · 2020Trial
- Trial
- A clinical prediction model for outcome and therapy delivery in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma (UK Myeloma Research Alliance Risk Profile): a development and validation study.The Lancet. Haematology · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed elderly multiple myeloma patients: a prospective multicenter study.Haematologica · 2016Trial
- Autotransplant with and without induction chemotherapy in older multiple myeloma patients: long-term outcome of a randomized trial.Haematologica · 2016Trial
- Advances in the application of frailty scoring in the diagnosis and management of elderly patients with multiple myeloma (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment of Older Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Prospective Observational Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Ixazomib-lenalidomid-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)-multicenter real-world analysis from Germany and comparative review of the literature.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
- Review
- Response to daratumumab-retreatment in patients with multiple myeloma.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Myosteatosis in multiple myeloma: a key determinant of survival beyond sarcopenia.Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
- The characteristics of Korean elderly multiple myeloma patients aged 80 years or over.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- Case Report: Ablation as novel x therapy in the regimen for frail hematological malignancies with extramedullary lesion.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Healthcare Costs and Treatment Patterns of Triplet Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Real World Evidence from Italy.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2025Article
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This first validation of the International Myeloma Working Group geriatric assessment in 125 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients was performed using the International Myeloma Working Group score based on age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index and cognitive and physical conditions (Activities of Daily Living / Instrumental Activities of Daily Living) to classify patients as fit, intermediate-fit or frail. We verified the International Myeloma Working Group score's impact on outcome, and whether additional tools complement it. Since our prior analyses determined renal, lung and Karnofsky performance impairment as multivariate risks, and the inclusion of frailty, age and cytogenetics complements this, we included the revised myeloma comorbidity index, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index and the Kaplan-Feinstein Index in this assessment. Multivariate analysis confirmed cytogenetics, Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and the Charlson Comorbidity Index as risks: 3-year overall survival for fit, intermediate-fit and frail patients was 91%, 77% and 47%, respectively. Using the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index, the Kaplan-Feinstein Index and the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index allowed us to define fit and frail patients with distinct progression-free and overall survival rates, with the most pronounced differences evidenced via the International Myeloma Working Group score, the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index. Since the Charlson Comorbidity Index is included in the International Myeloma Working Group score, we propose the latter and the revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index for future frailty measurements. Both are useful instruments for identifying myeloma patients with a geriatric risk profile and have a strong prognostic value for functional decline and overall survival. The study was registered as: (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: 00003686).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.