ReviewJAMA neurology2016
Synthetic Nucleic Acids and Treatment of Neurological Diseases.
Review in JAMA neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving IL12 immunotherapy in glioblastoma by targeting the long noncoding RNA INCR1.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Intravenously Administered Novel Liposomes, DCL64, Deliver Oligonucleotides to Cerebellar Purkinje Cells.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2019Article
- Interplay between long non-coding RNAs and epigenetic machinery: emerging targets in cancer?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Review
- Recent Advances in Antisense Oligonucleotide Therapy in Genetic Neuromuscular Diseases.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe ability to control gene expression with antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) could provide a new treatment strategy for disease.
objectiveTo review the use of ASOs for the treatment of neurological disorders. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Articles were identified through a search of PubMed references from 2000 to 2016 for articles describing the use of ASOs to treat disease, with specific attention to neurological disease. We concentrated our review on articles pertaining to activation of frataxin expression (Friedreich's ataxia) and production of active survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2, spinal muscular atrophy).
findingsMany neurological diseases are caused by inappropriate expression of a protein. Mutations may reduce expression of a wild-type protein, and strategies to activate expression may provide therapeutic benefit. For other diseases, a mutant protein may be expressed too highly and methods that reduce mutant protein expression might form the basis for drug development. Synthetic ASOs can recognize cellular RNA and control gene expression. Antisense oligonucleotides are not a new concept, but successful clinical development has proceeded at a slow pace. Advances in ASO chemistry, biological understanding, and clinical design are making successful applications more likely. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Both laboratory and clinical studies are demonstrating the potential of ASOs as a source of drugs to treat neurological disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27479447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.