Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27479087›Full record

ReviewLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2016

A survey of changing trends in modelling radiation lung injury in mice: bringing out the good, the bad, and the uncertain.

Mohamad B Dabjan, Carolyn Ms Buck, Isabel L Jackson, Zeljko Vujaskovic, Brian Marples, Julian D Down

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. PersonalizedJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Translational medicine for acute lung injury.Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Radiation-induced multi-organ injury.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Sex differences in radiation research.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamad B DabjanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Carolyn Ms BuckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Isabel L JacksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Zeljko VujaskovicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brian MarplesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Julian D DownInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within this millennium there has been resurgence in funding and research dealing with animal models of radiation-induced lung injury to identify and establish predictive biomarkers and effective mitigating agents that are applicable to humans. Most have been performed on mice but there needs to be assurance that the emphasis on such models is not misplaced. We therefore considered it timely to perform a comprehensive appraisal of the literature dealing with radiation lung injury of mice and to critically evaluate the validity and clinical relevance of the research. A total of 357 research papers covering the period of 1970-2015 were extensively reviewed. Whole thorax irradiation (WTI) has become the most common treatment for studying lung injury in mice and distinct trends were seen with regard to the murine strain, radiation dose, intended pathology investigated, length of study, and assays. Recently, the C57BL/6 strain has been increasingly used in the majority of these studies with the notion that they are susceptible to pulmonary fibrosis. Nonetheless, many of these investigations depend on animal survival as the primary end point and neglect the importance of radiation pneumonitis and the anomaly of lethal pleural effusions. A relatively large variation in survival times of C5BL/6 mice is also seen among different institutions pointing to the need for standardization of radiation treatments and environmental conditions. An analysis of mitigating drug treatments is complicated by the fact that the majority of studies are limited to the C57BL/6 strain with a premature termination of the experiments and do not establish whether the treatment actually prevents or simply delays the progression of radiation injury. This survey of the literature has pointed to several improvements that need to be considered in establishing a reliable preclinical murine model of radiation lung injury. The lethality end point should also be used cautiously and with greater emphasis on other assays such as non-invasive lung functional and imaging monitoring in order to quantify specific pulmonary injury that can be better extrapolated to radiation toxicity encountered in our own species.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsGene ExpressionHumansLungMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred CBARadiation InjuriesSpecies SpecificitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.