ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Inference of Gene Regulatory Network Based on Local Bayesian Networks.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 191 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks From Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data by Dual-Role Graph Contrastive Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Harnessing AI to fuse phenotypic signatures for drug target identification: progress in computational modeling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- HSTXGB: a hyperparameter self-tuning XGBoost method integrating pre- and post-processing for gene regulatory network inference.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- BCTI: a Bayesian network-based method for revealing critical transitions in complex biological systems.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Article
- Cross-attention graph neural networks for inferring gene regulatory networks with skewed degree distribution.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Reconstructing Dynamic Gene Regulatory Networks Using f-Divergence from Time-Series scRNA-Seq Data.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Bayesian networks for network inference in biology.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Review
- Global stabilization of Boolean networks with applications to biomolecular network control.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diffusion-based generation of gene regulatory networks from scRNA-seq data with DigNet.Genome research · 2025Article
- Determining interaction directionality in complex biochemical networks from stationary measurements.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks for Breast Cancer Based on Genetic Modules.BME frontiers · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric allergy research.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Review
- Article
- Learning massive interpretable gene regulatory networks of the human brain by merging Bayesian networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Inferring a directed acyclic graph of phenotypes from GWAS summary statistics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- SIGNET: transcriptome-wide causal inference for gene regulatory networks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Open MoA: revealing the mechanism of action (MoA) based on network topology and hierarchy.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- iLSGRN: inference of large-scale gene regulatory networks based on multi-model fusion.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- SIGNET: Transcriptome-wide Causal Inference for Gene Regulatory Networks.Research square · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inference of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from expression data can mine the direct regulations among genes and gain deep insights into biological processes at a network level. During past decades, numerous computational approaches have been introduced for inferring the GRNs. However, many of them still suffer from various problems, e.g., Bayesian network (BN) methods cannot handle large-scale networks due to their high computational complexity, while information theory-based methods cannot identify the directions of regulatory interactions and also suffer from false positive/negative problems. To overcome the limitations, in this work we present a novel algorithm, namely local Bayesian network (LBN), to infer GRNs from gene expression data by using the network decomposition strategy and false-positive edge elimination scheme. Specifically, LBN algorithm first uses conditional mutual information (CMI) to construct an initial network or GRN, which is decomposed into a number of local networks or GRNs. Then, BN method is employed to generate a series of local BNs by selecting the k-nearest neighbors of each gene as its candidate regulatory genes, which significantly reduces the exponential search space from all possible GRN structures. Integrating these local BNs forms a tentative network or GRN by performing CMI, which reduces redundant regulations in the GRN and thus alleviates the false positive problem. The final network or GRN can be obtained by iteratively performing CMI and local BN on the tentative network. In the iterative process, the false or redundant regulations are gradually removed. When tested on the benchmark GRN datasets from DREAM challenge as well as the SOS DNA repair network in E.coli, our results suggest that LBN outperforms other state-of-the-art methods (ARACNE, GENIE3 and NARROMI) significantly, with more accurate and robust performance. In particular, the decomposition strategy with local Bayesian networks not only effectively reduce the computational cost of BN due to much smaller sizes of local GRNs, but also identify the directions of the regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.