ReviewCancer2016
Diagnostic and treatment strategy for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Review in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- English version of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) issued by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Guideline
- LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN SURGERY IN GASTRIC GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS LARGER THAN 5 CM: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Risk stratification for 1- to 2-cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: visual assessment of CT and EUS high-risk features versus CT radiomics analysis.European radiology · 2023Trial
- Comparison of Endoscopic Cap External Snare Resection (ECESR) and Endoscopic Muscularis Dissection (EMD) for Small Gastric Submucosal Tumors (≤ 12 mm) Emerging from the Muscularis propria.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Reverse Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Gastric Submucosal Tumors With a Predominant Extraluminal Growth Pattern.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- A scoring model for differentiating gastric calcifying fibrous tumors from gastrointestinal stromal tumors less than 2 cm based on CT features.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Endoscopic full-thickness resection for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Comparison of single-incision intragastric and conventional multiport laparoscopic wedge resections for endophytic gastric subepithelial tumors: a retrospective single-center cohort study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Comparison of treatment strategies for submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria at esophagogastric junction or cardia.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the small intestine presenting as a giant intratumoral abscess: a rare case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Reopenable clip over-the-line method in endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric submucosal tumors: A historical control study.DEN open · 2025Article
- Defining Textbook Outcomes for Minimally Invasive Surgical Resection of Small Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) of the Stomach.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Deep learning model combined with computed tomography features to preoperatively predicting the risk stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Gene Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Advances in Treatment and Mechanism Research.Global medical genetics · 2024Review
- ASO Author Reflections: The Optimal Timing for Resection in Patients with Small GISTs: Balancing Risks and Benefits.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Patients with Small Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors at a High-Volume Sarcoma Center.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- The impact of gender on survival outcomes in patients with small intestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive analysis using the SEER database.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Enbloc or Piecemeal Removal After Enbloc Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are considered to be potentially malignant mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Clinically relevant GISTs are rare; however, subclinical GISTs (mini-GISTs) (1-2 cm) and pathologic GISTs (micro-GISTs) (<1 cm) are frequently reported. Most mini-GISTs and almost all micro-GISTs of the stomach may exhibit benign clinical behavior, and only mini-GISTs with high-risk features may progress. For this review, a provisional algorithm was used to propose diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with small GISTs. Because surgery is the only potentially curative treatment, in its application for small GISTs, the principles of sarcoma surgery should be maintained, and cost effectiveness should be considered. Indications for surgery include GISTs measuring ≥2 cm, symptomatic GISTs, and mini-GISTs with high-risk features (irregular borders, cystic spaces, ulceration, echogenic foci, internal heterogeneity, and tumor progression during follow-up); however, a preoperative pathologic diagnosis is infrequently obtained. For small intestinal and colorectal GISTs, surgery is indicated irrespective of size because of their greater malignant potential. Otherwise, mini-GISTs without high-risk features, micro-GISTs, and small submucosal tumors measuring <5 cm without high-risk features may be followed by periodical endoscopic ultrasonography. Although surgical approaches and operative methods are selected according to tumor size, location, growth pattern, and surgical teams, laparoscopic surgery has produced similar oncologic outcomes and is less invasiveness compared with open surgery. After resection, pathologic examination for diagnosis and risk assessment is mandatory, and genotyping is also recommended for high-risk GISTs. Endoscopic resection techniques, although feasible, are not routinely indicated for most mini-GISTs or micro-GISTs. Cancer 2016;122:3110-8. © 2016 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.