Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27478903›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2017

Engineering Nucleotide Specificity of Succinyl-CoA Synthetase in Blastocystis: The Emerging Role of Gatekeeper Residues.

Kapil Vashisht, Sonia Verma, Sunita Gupta, Andrew M Lynn, Rajnikant Dixit, Neelima Mishra, Neena Valecha, Karleigh A Hamblin, Robin Maytum, Kailash C Pandey and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kapil VashishtHost-parasite Interaction Biology Group, National Institute of Malaria Research, ICMR , New Delhi 110077, India.
Sonia VermaHost-parasite Interaction Biology Group, National Institute of Malaria Research, ICMR , New Delhi 110077, India.
Sunita GuptaSchool of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University , New Delhi 110067, India.
Andrew M LynnSchool of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University , New Delhi 110067, India.
Rajnikant DixitHost-parasite Interaction Biology Group, National Institute of Malaria Research, ICMR , New Delhi 110077, India.
Neelima MishraHost-parasite Interaction Biology Group, National Institute of Malaria Research, ICMR , New Delhi 110077, India.
Neena ValechaHost-parasite Interaction Biology Group, National Institute of Malaria Research, ICMR , New Delhi 110077, India.
Karleigh A HamblinBiosciences, University of Exeter , Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, U.K.
Robin MaytumSchool of Life Sciences, University of Bedfordshire , University Square, Luton LU1 3JU, U.K.
Kailash C PandeyHost-parasite Interaction Biology Group, National Institute of Malaria Research, ICMR , New Delhi 110077, India.
Mark van der GiezenBiosciences, University of Exeter , Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, U.K.
National Institute of Malaria Research · INJawaharlal Nehru University · IN

Funding

Wellcome Trust 078566/A/05/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charged, solvent-exposed residues at the entrance to the substrate binding site (gatekeeper residues) produce electrostatic dipole interactions with approaching substrates, and control their access by a novel mechanism called "electrostatic gatekeeper effect". This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that the nucleotide specificity can be engineered by altering the electrostatic properties of the gatekeeper residues outside the binding site. Using Blastocystis succinyl-CoA synthetase (SCS, EC 6.2.1.5), we demonstrated that the gatekeeper mutant (ED) resulted in ATP-specific SCS to show high GTP specificity. Moreover, nucleotide binding site mutant (LF) had no effect on GTP specificity and remained ATP-specific. However, via combination of the gatekeeper mutant with the nucleotide binding site mutant (ED+LF), a complete reversal of nucleotide specificity was obtained with GTP, but no detectable activity was obtained with ATP. This striking result of the combined mutant (ED+LF) was due to two changes; negatively charged gatekeeper residues (ED) favored GTP access, and nucleotide binding site residues (LF) altered ATP binding, which was consistent with the hypothesis of the "electrostatic gatekeeper effect". These results were further supported by molecular modeling and simulation studies. Hence, it is imperative to extend the strategy of the gatekeeper effect in a different range of crucial enzymes (synthetases, kinases, and transferases) to engineer substrate specificity for various industrial applications and substrate-based drug design.

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringAdenosine TriphosphateAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBinding SitesBlastocystisCloning, MolecularEscherichia coliGene ExpressionGuanosine TriphosphateKineticsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationProtein BindingProtein Structure, SecondaryProtozoan ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphateGuanosine TriphosphateProtozoan ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsSuccinate-CoA Ligases

Identifiers

PMID27478903
PMCPMC5404824
OpenAlexW2503298866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.