ArticleGynecology and obstetrics research : open journal2016
Developmental exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals alters the epigenome: Identification of reprogrammed targets.
Article in Gynecology and obstetrics research : open journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- The Impact of High-Resolution LC-MS/MS Detected Environmental Exposures on Obesity: A Study of Cumulative Effects Through Statistical Modeling.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Endocrine disruptors and children's health.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- The associations between exposure to mixed environmental endocrine disruptors and sex steroid hormones in men: a comparison of different statistical models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Racial disparities between measures of area deprivation and financial toxicity, and uterine volume in myomectomy patients.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Evidence-Based Approach for Secondary Prevention of Uterine Fibroids (The ESCAPE Approach).International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Developmental reprogramming of myometrial stem cells by endocrine disruptor linking to risk of uterine fibroids.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
- Endocrine Disruptor Chemicals and Children's Health.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Comprehensive Review of Uterine Fibroids: Developmental Origin, Pathogenesis, and Treatment.Endocrine reviews · 2022Review
- An Interplay between Epigenetics and Translation in Oocyte Maturation and Embryo Development: Assisted Reproduction Perspective.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Impact of Environmentally Relevant Concentrations of Bisphenol A (BPA) on the Gene Expression Profile in an In Vitro Model of the Normal Human Ovary.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Combined Effects of Different Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) on Prostate Gland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Breast and prostate glands affected by environmental substances (Review).Oncology reports · 2021Review
- Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Vitamin D Deficiency in the Pathogenesis of Uterine Fibroids.Journal of advanced pharmacy research · 2021Article
- Article
- Mice lacking uterine enhancer of zeste homolog 2 have transcriptomic changes associated with uterine epithelial proliferation.Physiological genomics · 2020Article
- Mice lacking membrane estrogen receptor 1 are protected from reproductive pathologies resulting from developmental estrogen exposure†.Biology of reproduction · 2019Article
- Burden of Uterine Fibroids: An African Perspective, A Call for Action and Opportunity for Intervention.Current opinion in gynecology and obstetrics · 2019Article
- Endocrine Disruptors and Autism Spectrum Disorder in Pregnancy: A Review and Evaluation of the Quality of the Epidemiological Evidence.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Endocrine disruptor exposure during development increases incidence of uterine fibroids by altering DNA repair in myometrial stem cells.Biology of reproduction · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Endocrine disruptions induced by environmental toxicants have placed an immense burden on society to properly diagnose, treat and attempt to alleviate symptoms and disease. Environmental exposures during critical periods of development can permanently reprogram normal physiological responses, thereby increasing susceptibility to disease later in life - a process known as developmental reprogramming. During development, organogenesis and tissue differentiation occur through a continuous series of tightly-regulated and precisely-timed molecular, biochemical and cellular events. Humans may encounter endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) daily and during all stages of life, from conception and fetal development through adulthood and senescence. Though puberty and perimenopausal periods may be affected by endocrine disruption due to hormonal effects, prenatal and early postnatal windows are most critical for proper development due to rapid changes in system growth. Developmental reprogramming is shown to be caused by alterations in the epigenome. Development is the time when epigenetic programs are 'installed' on the genome by 'writers', such as histone methyltransferases (HMTs) and DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), which add methyl groups to lysine and arginine residues on histone tails and to CpG sites in DNA, respectively. A number of environmental compounds, referred to as estrogenic endocrine disruptors (EEDs), are able to bind to estrogen receptors (ERs) and interfere with the normal cellular development in target tissues including the prostate and uterus. These EEDs, including diethylstilbestrol (DES), bisphenol A (BPA), and genistein (a phytoestrogen derived from soybeans), have been implicated in the malformation of reproductive organs and later development of disease. Due to the lack of fully understanding the underlying mechanisms of how environmental toxicants and their level of exposure affect the human genome, it can be challenging to create clear clinical guidance to address the potential health effects of lower-level exposures commonly experienced within the general population. In addition, human studies concerning environmental exposures are limited in feasibility by ethical concerns for human safety. Therefore, studies in animal models provide great opportunities to reveal links between early-life exposure to EDCs and related diseases. It has been shown that developmental exposure to EDCs, such as diethylstilbestrol (DES) and genistein, during reproductive tract development increases the incidence, multiplicity and overall size of uterine fibroids in the Eker rat model, concomitantly reprogramming estrogen-responsive gene expression. Importantly, EDC exposure represses enhancer of zeste 2 (EZH2) and reduces levels of the histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) repressive mark through Estrogen receptor / Phosphatidylinositide 3-kinases / Protein kinase B non-genomic signaling in the developing uterus. More recent research identified a developmental reprogramming target,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.