Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27478844›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2016

Comparison of Three Chemotherapy Regimens in Elderly Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: Experience at a Single National Reference Center in Mexico.

Diana Nolasco-Medina, Nancy Reynoso-Noveron, Alejandro Mohar-Betancourt, Alejandro Aviles-Salas, Osvaldo García-Perez, Myrna Candelaria

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Temporal trends in time toxicity of R-CHOP: a nationwide hospital-based database analysis in Japan.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diana Nolasco-MedinaHematology Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, 14080 Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
Nancy Reynoso-NoveronClinical Research Division, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, 14080 Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
Alejandro Mohar-BetancourtClinical Research Division, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, 14080 Mexico City, DF, Mexico; Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, 04510 Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
Alejandro Aviles-SalasPathology Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, 14080 Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
Osvaldo García-PerezNuclear Medicine Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, 14080 Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
Myrna CandelariaClinical Research Division, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, 14080 Mexico City, DF, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5478-714X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Although chemotherapy added to rituximab is a standard of care for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), treatment of patients ≥65 years of age remains controversial due to comorbidities. Methods. This is a retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized study of patients ≥65 years of age, who were diagnosed with DLBCL but not previously treated. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities were analyzed. Three rituximab-containing treatment regimens (standard RCHOP, anthracycline dose-reduced RChOP, and RCOP) were compared. Descriptive analyses were conducted. Survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared with the log-rank test. Results. In total, 141 patients with a median age of 73.9 years were studied. The three treatment groups had comparable demographic characteristics. The overall response was 77%, 72.5%, and 59% in groups treated with RCHOP, RChOP, and RCOP, respectively. After multivariate analysis, the factors influencing the overall survival were the presence of B symptoms, poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 3), and febrile neutropenia. Factors influencing disease-free survival were febrile neutropenia, high-intermediate and high-risk IPI scores, and treatment without anthracycline. Conclusion. A higher ORR (overall response rate) was achieved with standard RCHOP, which influenced DFS and OS, although it was not statistically significant compared with the other groups. Interventional phase 3 trials testing new molecules in patients aged 70 to 80 years and older are required to improve the prognosis within this growing population.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnthracyclinesAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinFemaleHumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMalePrednisonePrognosisRituximabVincristineAnthracyclinesAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinPrednisoneR-CHOP protocolRituximabVincristine

Identifiers

PMID27478844
PMCPMC4958419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.