Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27478427›Full record

ArticleGynecological surgery

Gynaecological endoscopic surgical education and assessment. A diploma programme in gynaecological endoscopic surgery.

Rudi Campo, Arnaud Wattiez, Vasilis Tanos, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Grigoris Grimbizis, Diethelm Wallwiener, Sara Brucker, Marco Puga, Roger Molinas, Peter O'Donovan and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecological surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Laparoscopic ultrasound eXAmination: Analysis of fellow surgeons learning curve in minimally invasive gynecologic procedures (LUXA study).International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. EndoTrainer: a novel hybrid training platform for endoscopic surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Simulation and Training of Gynaecological Skills.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rudi CampoLife Expert Centre, Schipvaartstraat 2 Bus 4, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; European Academy for Gynaecological Surgery, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Brussels, Belgium.
Arnaud WattiezLife Expert Centre, Schipvaartstraat 2 Bus 4, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; European Academy for Gynaecological Surgery, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Vasilis TanosEuropean Academy for Gynaecological Surgery, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Attilio Di Spiezio SardoEuropean Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Grigoris GrimbizisEuropean Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Diethelm WallwienerEuropean Academy for Gynaecological Surgery, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstraat 7, 72077 Tuebingen, Germany.
Sara BruckerEuropean Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstraat 7, 72077 Tuebingen, Germany.
Marco PugaEuropean Academy for Gynaecological Surgery, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Roger MolinasEuropean Academy for Gynaecological Surgery, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Peter O'DonovanEuropean Academy for Gynaecological Surgery, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Jan DeprestEuropean Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; Center for Surgical Technologies, Leuven, Belgium.
Yves Van BelleEuropean Academy for Gynaecological Surgery, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Ann LissensEuropean Academy for Gynaecological Surgery, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; Center for Surgical Technologies, Leuven, Belgium ; University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anja HerrmannPius-Hospital Oldenburg, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynaecological Oncology, Carlvon Ossietzky University, Georgstraße 12, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany.
Mahmood TahirEuropean Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Brussels, Belgium.
Chiara BenedettoEuropean Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Brussels, Belgium.
Igno SiebertAfrican Endoscopic Training Academy, Cape Town, South Africa.
Benoit RabischongInternational Centre for Endoscopic Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Rudy Leon De WildeEuropean Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynaecological Oncology, Carlvon Ossietzky University, Georgstraße 12, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany.
The European Academy of Gynaecological Surgery · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRPius Hospital Oldenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, training and education in endoscopic surgery has been critically reviewed. Clinicians, both surgeons as gynaecologist who perform endoscopic surgery without proper training of the specific psychomotor skills, are at higher risk to increased patient morbidity and mortality. Although the apprentice-tutor model has long been a successful approach for training of surgeons, recently, clinicians have recognised that endoscopic surgery requires an important training phase outside the operating theatre. The Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment programme (GESEA) recognises the necessity of this structured approach and implements two separated stages in its learning strategy. In the first stage, a skill certificate on theoretical knowledge and specific practical psychomotor skills is acquired through a high-stake exam; in the second stage, a clinical programme is completed to achieve surgical competence and receive the corresponding diploma. Three diplomas can be awarded: (a) the Bachelor in Endoscopy, (b) the Minimally Invasive Gynaecological Surgeon (MIGS) and (c) the Master level. The Master level is sub-divided into two separate diplomas: the Master in Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery and the Master in Hysteroscopy. The complexity of modern surgery has increased the demands and challenges to surgical education and the quality control. This programme is based on the best available scientific evidence, and it counteracts the problem of the traditional surgical apprentice-tutor model. It is seen as a major step toward standardisation of endoscopic surgical training in general.

Indexed as

EducationEndoscopic surgeryHysteroscopyLaparoscopyPractical skills

Identifiers

PMID27478427
PMCPMC4949291
OpenAlexW2475282058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.