ArticleEvaluation (London, England : 1995)2016
Realism and resources: Towards more explanatory economic evaluation.
Article in Evaluation (London, England : 1995), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing a facilitated social network intervention for health outcomes in lonely and socially isolated people: the pragmatic, cluster-randomized PALS trial.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Article
- Usability testing a web application to support evidence-based commissioning decisions for implementing mobile stroke units.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Understanding Socio-Material Relations in Nurse Staffing Systems: Insights From a Qualitative Study in England and Wales.Nursing inquiry · 2025Article
- Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of mobile stroke units in England and Wales: A mixed methods study.PloS one · 2025Article
- 'For Want of a Nail': developing a transparent approach to retroduction and early initial programme theory development in a realist evaluation of community end of life care services.International journal of social research methodology · 2024Article
- Developing a Conceptual Framework for Socioeconomic Impact Research in European Cancer Patients: A 'Best-Fit' Framework Synthesis.The patient · 2023Article
- Wrestling with the bottom line in medical education.Medical education · 2022Article
- Realist evaluation of the impact of the research translation process on health system sustainability: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Medication optimisation in severe mental illness (MEDIATE): protocol for a realist review.BMJ open · 2022Article
- How has implementation been incorporated in health technology assessments in the United Kingdom? A systematic rapid review.Health research policy and systems · 2021Review
- Article
- Conducting Value for Money Analyses for Non-randomised Interventional Studies Including Service Evaluations: An Educational Review with Recommendations.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Review
- Article
- What is the impact of large-scale implementation of stroke Early Supported Discharge? A mixed methods realist evaluation study protocol.Implementation science : IS · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To be successfully and sustainably adopted, policy-makers, service managers and practitioners want public programmes to be affordable and cost-effective, as well as effective. While the realist evaluation question is often summarised as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.