Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27478170›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2016

Prognostic Value of p16 Status on the Development of a Complete Response in Involved Oropharynx Cancer Neck Nodes After Cisplatin-Based Chemoradiation: A Secondary Analysis of NRG Oncology RTOG 0129.

Thomas J Galloway, Qiang Ed Zhang, Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan, David I Rosenthal, Denis Soulieres, André Fortin, Craig L Silverman, Megan E Daly, John A Ridge, J Alexander Hammond and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas J GallowayFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: thomas.galloway@fccc.edu.
Qiang Ed ZhangNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Phuc Felix Nguyen-TanCentre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal-Notre Dame, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
David I RosenthalUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Denis SoulieresCentre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal-Notre Dame, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
André FortinL Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Craig L SilvermanThe James Brown Cancer Center-University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Megan E DalyUniversity of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California.
John A RidgeFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Alexander HammondLondon Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada.
Quynh-Thu LeStanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USHôpital Notre-Dame · CAHôtel-Dieu de Québec · CANRG Oncology · USStanford Medicine · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · USUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
RTOG Foreign AccrualU10CA021661 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI CURRAN, WALTER J. · 1985 to 2013
$150.3M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Mei-Yin C Polley · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS U10 CA021661NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the relationship between p16 status and the regional response of patients with node-positive oropharynx cancer treated on NRG Oncology RTOG 0129. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with N1-N3 oropharynx cancer and known p16 status who underwent treatment on RTOG 0129 were analyzed. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in patients treated with a postchemoradiation neck dissection (with p16-positive or p16-negative cancer) were compared by Fisher exact test. Patients managed expectantly were compared with those treated with a neck dissection.

resultsNinety-nine (34%) of 292 patients with node-positive oropharynx cancer and known p16 status underwent a posttreatment neck dissection (p16-positive: n=69; p16-negative: n=30). The remaining 193 patients with malignant lymphadenopathy at diagnosis were observed. Neck dissection was performed a median of 70 (range, 17-169) days after completion of chemoradiation. Neither the pretreatment nodal stage (P=.71) nor the postradiation, pre-neck dissection clinical/radiographic neck assessment (P=.42) differed by p16 status. A pCR was more common among p16-positive patients (78%) than p16-negative patients (53%, P=.02) and was associated with a reduced incidence of local-regional failure (hazard ratio 0.33, P=.003). On multivariate analysis of local-regional failure, a test for interaction between pCR and p16 status was not significant (P=.37). One-hundred ninety-three (66%) of 292 of initially node-positive patients were managed without a posttreatment neck dissection. Development of a clinical (cCR) was not significantly influenced by p16-status (P=.42). Observed patients with a clinical nodal CR had disease control outcomes similar to those in patients with a pCR neck dissection.

conclusionsPatients with p16-positive tumors had significantly higher pCR and locoregional control rates than those with p16-negative tumors.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorChemoradiotherapyCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16FemaleHumansInternationalityLymph NodesMaleNeckNeck DissectionOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPrevalencePrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCDKN2A protein, humanCisplatinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16

Identifiers

PMID27478170
PMCPMC5078986
OpenAlexW2401601001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.