Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27477840›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2017

Lanolin for the treatment of nipple pain in breastfeeding women: a randomized controlled trial.

Kimberley T Jackson, Cindy-Lee Dennis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06317688 (Effectiveness of Highly Purified Anhydrous), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06317688 phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Highly Purified Anhydrous (HPA) Lanolin Versus Extra-Virgin Coconut Oil in Preventing Subacute Lactation Mastitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas Woman's UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsLactation Mastitis, Breast Feeding, Staphylococcus Aureus InfectionArmsExtra-Virgin Coconut Oil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Comparative Study of the Use of HPA Lanolin and Breast Milk for Treating Pain Associated with Nipple Trauma.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2018
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Postpartum Nipple Symptoms: Risk Factors and Dermatologic Characterization.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberley T JacksonUniversity of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Cindy-Lee DennisLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Canada and Women's Health Research Chair, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CAWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nipple pain and damage are commonly experienced by breastfeeding women and are associated with negative breastfeeding outcomes. Health care providers often recommend the application of lanolin to treat painful/damaged nipples, yet no randomized controlled trial has evaluated the effectiveness of lanolin on nipple pain and breastfeeding outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of lanolin on nipple pain among breastfeeding women with damaged nipples. A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Breastfeeding women (N = 186) identified as having nipple pain/damage were randomized to apply lanolin (intervention group; n = 93) or to receive usual postpartum care (control group; n = 93). The primary outcome was nipple pain at 4 days post-randomization measured by the Numeric Rating Scale. Additional outcomes included nipple pain measured by the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, breastfeeding duration/exclusivity, breastfeeding self-efficacy, and maternal satisfaction with lanolin treatment versus usual care. The results revealed no significant group differences in mean pain scores at 4 days post-randomization. Women in both groups experienced clinically relevant decreases in nipple pain by 7 days post-randomization. Significantly, more women in the lanolin group reported that they were satisfied with treatment compared with those receiving usual care. No significant group differences were found for other secondary outcomes. While more women were satisfied using lanolin, its application to sore/damaged nipples was ineffective for reducing nipple pain or improving breastfeeding outcomes.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementAdultBreast FeedingCanadaCosmeticsFemaleHumansLanolinNipplesPainSample SizeSingle-Blind MethodSocioeconomic FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCosmeticsLanolin

Identifiers

PMID27477840
PMCPMC6865977
OpenAlexW2492522985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.