ArticleScientific reports2016
Microbial Nanoculture as an Artificial Microniche.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tunable lysis of functionalized nanocultures for efficient microbial and nucleic acid recovery.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2025Article
- Predictive Modeling and Experimental Validation of Magnetophoretic Delivery of Magnetic Nanocultures.ACS materials letters · 2025Article
- Fabricated devices for performing bacterial-fungal interaction experiments across scales.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Micro-Technologies for Assessing Microbial Dynamics in Controlled Environments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Dielectrophoresis Response of Water-in-Oil-in-Water Double Emulsion Droplets with Singular or Dual Cores.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Strain-level epidemiology of microbial communities and the human microbiome.Genome medicine · 2020Review
- Generation of Ultra-Thin-Shell Microcapsules Using Osmolarity-Controlled Swelling Method.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Gaussian Curvature Directs Stress Fiber Orientation and Cell Migration.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Assembly and Tracking of Microbial Community Development within a Microwell Array Platform.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
- Candida albicans stimulates Streptococcus mutans microcolony development via cross-kingdom biofilm-derived metabolites.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbes self-organize in microcolonies while transitioning to a sessile form within a protective biofilm matrix. To enable the detailed study of microbial dynamics within these microcolonies, new sessile culture systems are needed that sequester cells and mimic their complex growth conditions and interactions. We present a new nanoliter-scale sessile culture system that is easily implemented via microfluidics-enabled fabrication. Hundreds of thousands of these nanocultures can be easily generated and imaged using conventional or confocal microscopy. Each nanoculture begins as a several nanoliter droplet of suspended cells, encapsulated by a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane. The PDMS shell provides long-lasting mechanical support, enabling long term study, and is selectively permeable to small molecules including antibiotics, signaling molecules and functional fluorescent probes. Thus, as microcolonies mature within the nanocultures, they can be stressed or interrogated using selected probes to characterize cell physiological properties, antibiotic susceptibilities, and antagonistic interactions. We demonstrate this platform by investigating broad ranges of microcolony dynamics, including direct and indirect bacterial-fungal interactions. This versatile new tool has broad potential for addressing biological questions associated with drug resistance, chronic infections, microbiome dynamics, and antibiotic discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.