Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27476506›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2016

Comparison between autologous blood transfusion drainage and closed-suction drainage/no drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Kun-Hao Hong, Jian-Ke Pan, Wei-Yi Yang, Ming-Hui Luo, Shu-Chai Xu, Jun Liu

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. No benefit of autologous transfusion drains in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kun-Hao HongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Guangdong Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, No. 60 Hengfu Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Jian-Ke PanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road,, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China.
Wei-Yi YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road,, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China.
Ming-Hui LuoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road,, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China.
Shu-Chai XuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road,, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road,, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China. liujun.gdtcm@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutologous blood transfusion (ABT) drainage system is a new unwashed salvaged blood retransfusion system for total knee replacement (TKA). However, whether to use ABT drainage, closed-suction (CS) drainage or no drainage in TKA surgery remains controversial. This is the first meta-analysis to assess the clinical efficiency, safety and potential advantages regarding the use of ABT drains compared with closed-suction/no drainage.

methodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched in March 2015. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and pooled for statistical analysis. The primary outcome evaluated was homologous blood transfusion rate. The secondary outcomes were post-operative haemoglobin on days 3-5, length of hospital stay and wound infections after TKA surgery.

resultsThe pooled data included 1,721 patients and showed that patients in the ABT drainage group might benefit from lower blood transfusion rates (16.59 % and 37.47 %, OR: 0.28 [0.14, 0.55]; 13.05 % and 16.91 %, OR: 0.73 [0.47,1.13], respectively). Autologous blood transfusion drainage and closed-suction drainage/no drainage have similar clinical efficacy and safety with regard to post-operative haemoglobin on days 3-5, length of hospital stay and wound infections.

conclusionsAutologous blood transfusion drainage offers a safe and efficient alternative to CS/no drainage with a lower blood transfusion rate. Future large-volume high-quality RCTs with extensive follow-up will affirm and update this system review.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood Transfusion, AutologousDrainageHemoglobinsHumansLength of StayOperative Blood SalvagePostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSuctionTreatment OutcomeHemoglobinsAutologous blood transfusionClosed-suctionDrainageDrainsKnee arthroplastyKnee replacement

Identifiers

PMID27476506
PMCPMC4968028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.