ArticleHIV medicine2017
Presentation for care and antenatal management of HIV in the UK, 2009-2014.
Article in HIV medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perinatal HIV in Europe: Clinical Advances and Psychosocial Challenges-A Scoping Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Review
- Two Decades of Change: Evolving Maternal Characteristics and Perinatal Outcomes in Pregnant Women Living with HIV.Viruses · 2025Article
- Late HIV diagnosis among migrant women living in Europe - a systematic review of barriers to HIV testing.IJID regions · 2023Review
- Characteristics, treatment and care of pregnant women living with hepatitis B in England: findings from a national audit.Epidemiology and infection · 2023Article
- Trends in antiretroviral use in pregnancy in the UK and Ireland, 2008-2018.HIV medicine · 2022Article
- Examining engagement in care of women living with HIV in South India.Health care for women international · 2020Article
- Investigation of prevention of mother to child HIV transmission program from 2011 to 2017 in Suzhou, China.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy in pregnant women infected with HIV in Brazil from 2000 to 2015: a cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Comprehensive nationwide analysis of mother-to-child HIV transmission in Finland from 1983 to 2013.Epidemiology and infection · 2018Article
- Adverse effects in children exposed to maternal HIV and antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy in Brazil: a cohort study.Reproductive health · 2018Article
- National audit of perinatal HIV infections in the UK, 2006-2013: what lessons can be learnt?HIV medicine · 2018Article
- Strategies for Monitoring Outcomes in HIV-Exposed Uninfected Children in the United Kingdom.Frontiers in immunology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDespite very low rates of vertical transmission of HIV in the UK overall, rates are higher among women starting antenatal antiretroviral therapy (ART) late. We investigated the timing of key elements of the care of HIV-positive pregnant women [antenatal care booking, HIV laboratory assessment (CD4 count and HIV viral load) and antenatal ART initiation], to assess whether clinical practice is changing in line with recommendations, and to investigate factors associated with delayed care.
methodsWe used the UK's National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood for 2009-2014. Data were analysed by fitting logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsA total of 5693 births were reported; 79.5% were in women diagnosed with HIV prior to that pregnancy. Median gestation at antenatal booking was 12.1 weeks [interquartile range (IQR) 10.0-15.6 weeks] and booking was significantly earlier during 2012-2014 vs. 2009-2011 (P < 0.001), although only in previously diagnosed women. Overall, 42.2% of pregnancies were booked late (≥ 13 gestational weeks). Among women not already on treatment, antenatal ART commenced at a median of 21.4 (IQR18.1-24.5) weeks and started significantly earlier in the most recent time period (P < 0.001). Compared with previously diagnosed women, those newly diagnosed during the current pregnancy booked later for antenatal care and started antenatal ART later (both P < 0.001). Multivariable analyses revealed demographic variations in access to or uptake of care, with groups including migrants and parous women initiating care later.
conclusionsAlthough women are accessing antenatal and HIV care earlier in pregnancy, some continue to face barriers to timely initiation of antenatal care and ART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.