Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27476073›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2017

Inequalities and Barriers to the Use of Supportive Care Among Young Breast Cancer Survivors: a Qualitative Understanding.

Veronique Regnier Denois, Madina Querre, Linjie Chen, Marion Barrault, Franck Chauvin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic review of the needs and health-related quality of life domains relevant to people surviving cancer in Europe.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Models, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of supportive care in cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Veronique Regnier DenoisHYGEE-ICLN, Université de Lyon, EA HESPER 7425, F-69003, Lyon, France. veronique.regnier@icloire.fr.
Madina QuerreREVeSS (Recherches et Etudes sur les Vulnérabilités Sociales et la Santé), Bordeaux, France.
Linjie ChenDecision & Information Sciences for Production Systems laboratory, INSA, Lyon, France.
Marion BarraultInstitut Bergonié, 229 cours de l'Argonne, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Franck ChauvinHYGEE-ICLN, Université de Lyon, EA HESPER 7425, F-69003, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of supportive care for cancer patients has been shown to have a positive impact on both mortality rates and many aspects of life after cancer, particularly in young women. Meanwhile, there are still numerous inequalities in terms of cancer mortalities and quality of life among cancer survivors in France. The processes leading to unequal access to supportive care services, and the impact this has on the post-treatment period, have been poorly documented, however. The goal of this study was to understand the barriers to using supportive care services among young women breast cancer survivors under the age of 50 and to find out how this can contribute to inequalities. Thirty-six young breast cancer survivors, one third of which deemed socially deprived, were interviewed using a qualitative, inductive approach at two comprehensive care centres in France. Our findings primarily show that there are still a number of barriers to accessing supportive care for a large number of patients. The way information about supportive services is delivered is a major cause of inequalities in the use of these services. The guidance provided does not take into account either the patients' needs or their capacity to integrate the information and anticipate problems. Certain specific post-treatment issues have yet to be addressed. Some systemic barriers could be lifted by changing the way information on supportive care services is currently organised and thereby prevent the survivorship plans now being implemented in cancer care settings from reinforcing health inequalities.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHealth Services AccessibilitySocioeconomic FactorsAdultAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsCommunicationFemaleFranceHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeBreast cancerOrganisationQualitativeRehabilitationSupportive careYoung women

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.