Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27475931›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2017

Operator variability in scan positioning is a major component of HR-pQCT precision error and is reduced by standardized training.

S Bonaretti, N Vilayphiou, C M Chan, A Yu, K Nishiyama, D Liu, S Boutroy, A Ghasem-Zadeh, S K Boyd, R Chapurlat and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Bone Microarchitecture and Strength in Long-Standing Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  9. Cortical Bone Loss Following Gastric Bypass Surgery Is Not Primarily Endocortical.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  10. Using 3D image registration to maximize the reproducibility of longitudinal bone strength assessment by HR-pQCT and finite element analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Longitudinal bone microarchitectural changes are best detected using image registration.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  14. Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  15. Accelerated Bone Loss in Older Men: Effects on Bone Microarchitecture and Strength.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2018
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Weight loss in men in late life and bone strength and microarchitecture: a prospective study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Article
  19. Effects of Gastric Bypass Surgery on Bone Mass and Microarchitecture Occur Early and Particularly Impact Postmenopausal Women.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

S BonarettiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. serena.bonaretti@stanford.edu.
N VilayphiouScanco Medical AG, Brüttisellen, Switzerland.
C M ChanUniversity of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
A YuDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
K NishiyamaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
D LiuUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
S BoutroyINSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
A Ghasem-ZadehDepartment of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
S K BoydDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
R ChapurlatINSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
H McKayUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
E ShaneDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
M L BouxseinCenter for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
D M BlackDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
S MajumdarDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
E S OrwollDivision of Endocrinology, Bone and Mineral Unit, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
T F LangDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
S KhoslaDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
A J BurghardtDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR000128 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ELLISON, DAVID H · 2012 to 2015
$28.7M
Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) - San Francisco Coordinating CenterU01AR066160 · NIAMS · CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MED CTR RES INSTITUTE · PI CUMMINGS, STEVEN RON · 2013 to 2017
$9.3M
Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) - MinneapolisU01AG042145 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ENSRUD, KRISTINE · 2013 to 2019
$5.3M
Osteporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS)- Admin CenterU01AG027810 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ORWOLL, ERIC S. · 2006 to 2017
$5.1M
Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) - PortlandU01AG042124 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ORWOLL, ERIC S. · 2013 to 2019
$3.0M
Osteoporatic Fractures in Men (MrOS)U01AG042168 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KADO, DEBORAH · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (Mr. Os) Palo AltoU01AG042143 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEFANICK, MARCIA L. · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (Mr.OS)U01AG042139 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CAULEY, JANE ANN · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
Osteoporotic Fractures in Men_MrOS Renewal_BirminghamU01AG042140 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SHIKANY, JAMES M · 2013 to 2019
$2.7M
Bone quality by vQCT and HR-pQCT: translation to multi-center clinical researchR01AR060700 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BURGHARDT, ANDREW JOHN, LANG, THOMAS F · 2011 to 2014
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000128NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR060700NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR066160NIA NIH HHS U01 AG027810NIA NIH HHS U01 AG042124NIA NIH HHS U01 AG042139NIA NIH HHS U01 AG042140NIA NIH HHS U01 AG042143NIA NIH HHS U01 AG042145NIA NIH HHS U01 AG042168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we determined that operator positioning precision contributes significant measurement error in high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Moreover, we developed software to quantify intra- and inter-operator variability and demonstrated that standard positioning training (now available as a web-based application) can significantly reduce inter-operator variability.

introductionHR-pQCT is increasingly used to assess bone quality, fracture risk, and anti-fracture interventions. The contribution of the operator has not been adequately accounted in measurement precision. Operators acquire a 2D projection ("scout view image") and define the region to be scanned by positioning a "reference line" on a standard anatomical landmark. In this study, we (i) evaluated the contribution of positioning variability to in vivo measurement precision, (ii) measured intra- and inter-operator positioning variability, and (iii) tested if custom training software led to superior reproducibility in new operators compared to experienced operators.

methodsTo evaluate the operator in vivo measurement precision, we compared precision errors calculated in 64 co-registered and non-co-registered scan-rescan images. To quantify operator variability, we developed software that simulates the positioning process of the scanner's software. Eight experienced operators positioned reference lines on scout view images designed to test intra- and inter-operator reproducibility. Finally, we developed modules for training and evaluation of reference line positioning. We enrolled six new operators to participate in a common training, followed by the same reproducibility experiments performed by the experienced group.

resultsIn vivo precision errors were up to threefold greater (Tt.BMD and Ct.Th) when variability in scan positioning was included. The inter-operator precision errors were significantly greater than the short-term intra-operator precision (p < 0.001). New trained operators achieved comparable intra-operator reproducibility to experienced operators and lower inter-operator reproducibility (p < 0.001). Precision errors were significantly greater for the radius than for the tibia.

conclusionOperator reference line positioning contributes significantly to in vivo measurement precision and is significantly greater for multi-operator datasets. Inter-operator variability can be significantly reduced using a systematic training platform, now available online ( http://webapps.radiology.ucsf.edu/refline/ ).

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAgedAged, 80 and overAnatomic LandmarksFemaleHumansInservice TrainingMaleOsteoporosisRadiusReproducibility of ResultsSoftware DesignTibiaTomography, X-Ray ComputedHR-pQCTMulticenter studiesOperator reproducibilityPrecisionStandardization

Identifiers

PMID27475931
PMCPMC5568957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.