Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27475909›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2016

"It is challenging… oh, nobody likes it!": a qualitative study exploring Mozambican adolescents and young adults' experiences with contraception.

Rehana Capurchande, Gily Coene, Ingrid Schockaert, Manuel Macia, Herman Meulemans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Socio-cultural factors perceived to influence sexual behaviours of adolescents in Ethiopia.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rehana CapurchandeDepartment of Sociology, Eduardo Mondlane University- Maputo, Campus Universitário Principal. CP 257, Maputo, Mozambique. rehana.dc@gmail.com.
Gily CoeneVrije Universiteit Brussel (Free University of Brussels), Department of Philosophy and Ethics, Centre for Research in Gender and Diversity, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Ingrid SchockaertDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Economic and Social Science, and Solvay Business School, Free University of Brussels, Pleinlaan 5, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Manuel MaciaDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Eduardo Mondlane University, Praça 25 de Junho, C. Postal 257, Maputo, Mozambique.
Herman MeulemansUniversiteit Antwerpen (Antwerp University), Department of Sociology, Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, Sint-Jacobstraat 2, BE-2000, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEEduardo Mondlane University · MZSolvay (Belgium) · BEUniversity of the Free State · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBy focusing upon formal sex education programmes, the Mozambican government has significantly enhanced the general health of adolescents and young adults. However, when it comes to contraception, little is known about how adolescents and young adults actually behave.

methodsBased upon a qualitative study in two settings in Maputo province - Ndlavela and Boane - this paper explores the knowledge and practices of contraception among adolescents and young adults. A total of four focus group discussions, 16 in-depth interviews, four informal conversations, and observations were equally divided between both study sites.

resultsDiscrepancies between what adolescents and young adults know and what they do quickly became evident. Ambivalent and contradictory practices concerning contraceptive use was the result. As well, young people had numerous interpretations of risk-taking when not using contraceptives. These inconsistencies are influenced by social and medical barriers such as restricted dialogue on sexuality among adolescents and young adults and their parents and peers. Additionally, ideas about indigenous contraceptives, notions of masculinity and femininity, misconceptions and fear of the side effects of contraceptives, make people of all ages wary of modern birth control. Other barriers include imposed contraceptive choice - meaning no choice, overly technical medical language used at clinics and the absence of healthcare workers more attuned to the needs of adolescents and young adults.

conclusionsAdolescents and young adults have numerous - often erroneous - opinions about contraception, leading to inconsistent use as well as vague perceptions of risk-taking. Moreover, social norms and cultural gender roles often contradict and hinder risk-avoiding behaviour. Therefore, in order to improve young people's health, policymakers must address the reasons behind this ambivalence and inconsistency.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMozambiquePerceptionQualitative ResearchRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorYoung AdultAdolescents/young adults’ healthBarriers to contraceptionMozambiqueRisk-taking

Identifiers

PMID27475909
PMCPMC4967333
OpenAlexW2480380882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.