Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27475825›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2017

Examining the Psychometric Properties of Three Standardized Screening Tools in a Pregnant and Parenting Population.

Ingunn Benediktsson, Sheila McDonald, Suzanne Tough

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessment tools to measure postnatal mental illness: A 10-year scoping review.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ingunn BenediktssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. ibenedik@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4172-4868
Sheila McDonaldDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Suzanne ToughFaculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance Although standardized tools such as the Speilberger State Anxiety scale (1970) and Cohen's Perceived Stress Index (1983) have often been used in pregnant and postpartum populations to evaluate psychosocial risk, there exists very little literature on the reliability of these scales in this population. Given the potentially grave consequences of undiagnosed pre and postpartum mental distress, it is of paramount importance that the tools that are commonly used are evaluated for their psychometric properties within the pregnant and parenting population. Methods The psychometric properties of three mental health scales were evaluated using the All Our Babies data. The All Our Babies cohort is a prospective longitudinal study based in Calgary, Alberta. A total of 3300 women were recruited from prenatal care sites from all four quadrants of the city. Participants were mailed questionnaires at 24-26 weeks gestation, 34-36 weeks and at 4 months postpartum. Reliability for the Speilberger State Anxiety Scale, the Perceived Stress Index and the Life Optimism Test-revised were evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alphas. Validity with related constructs were tested for the State Anxiety Scale and the Perceived Stress Index by calculating Pearson Correlation Coefficients with closely related constructs. Sample size varied from 2670 to 3376, according to the response rate and time point. Depression as a related construct was evaluated using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale. Results The Cronbach's Alphas for the Speilberger State Anxiety scale were 0.92, 0.92 and 0.93 for 24-26 weeks, 34-36 weeks and 4 months postpartum respectively. The Alpha's for the Perceived Stress index were 0.88, 0.88 and 0.89 respectively. The Life Optimism Test Revised was only measured in the third trimester and the Cronbach's alpha was 0.83. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient for Anxiety with depression were r = 0.73, r = 0.72 and r = 0.77 respectively. The coefficients for stress and depression were r = 0.75, r = 0.75 and r = 0.77 respectively. Discussion/Conclusion The psychometric properties for all three scales were strong, with alphas that were comparable or higher to literature values. These data provide evidence that the use of these scales, previously validated in other populations are appropriate for use in among pregnant and parenting women at risk for mental distress.

Indexed as

AdultAlbertaAnxietyCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMass ScreeningParentsPregnancyProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesCohen’s Perceived Stress IndexLife Optimism Test-RevisedPostpartumPregnancySpeilberger State Anxiety Scale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.