Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27475133›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2016

Speech intelligibility in rooms: Effect of prior listening exposure interacts with room acoustics.

Pavel Zahorik, Eugene J Brandewie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Speech intelligibility in rooms: Disrupting the effect of prior listening exposure.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pavel ZahorikDepartment of Otolaryngology and Communicative Disorders, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA.
Eugene J BrandewieDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

Funding

Perceptual processing of indirect soundR01DC008168 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI ZAHORIK, PAVEL A · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is now converging evidence that a brief period of prior listening exposure to a reverberant room can influence speech understanding in that environment. Although the effect appears to depend critically on the amplitude modulation characteristic of the speech signal reaching the ear, the extent to which the effect may be influenced by room acoustics has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study seeks to fill this gap in knowledge by testing the effect of prior listening exposure or listening context on speech understanding in five different simulated sound fields, ranging from anechoic space to a room with broadband reverberation time (T60) of approximately 3 s. Although substantial individual variability in the effect was observed and quantified, the context effect was, on average, strongly room dependent. At threshold, the effect was minimal in anechoic space, increased to a maximum of 3 dB on average in moderate reverberation (T60 = 1 s), and returned to minimal levels again in high reverberation. This interaction suggests that the functional effects of prior listening exposure may be limited to sound fields with moderate reverberation (0.4 ≤ T60 ≤ 1 s).

Indexed as

AcousticsSpeech AcousticsSpeech IntelligibilityAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory ThresholdEnvironment DesignFemaleHumansMalePerceptual MaskingPsychometricsSpeech PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27475133
PMCPMC6497457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.