Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27474721›Full record

ReviewApplied and environmental microbiology2016

Systematic Assessment of Nonproteolytic Clostridium botulinum Spores for Heat Resistance.

Ewelina Wachnicka, Sandra C Stringer, Gary C Barker, Michael W Peck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modeling inactivation of non-proteolyticFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Physical Treatments to ControlFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Guidance on date marking and related food information: part 1 (date marking).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact ofCurrent opinion in food science · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ewelina WachnickaInstitute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, United Kingdom wachnicka.ewelina@gmail.com.
Sandra C StringerInstitute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, United Kingdom.
Gary C BarkerInstitute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, United Kingdom.
Michael W PeckInstitute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004529/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledHeat treatment is an important controlling factor that, in combination with other hurdles (e.g., pH, aw), is used to reduce numbers and prevent the growth of and associated neurotoxin formation by nonproteolytic C. botulinum in chilled foods. It is generally agreed that a heating process that reduces the spore concentration by a factor of 10(6) is an acceptable barrier in relation to this hazard. The purposes of the present study were to review the available data relating to heat resistance properties of nonproteolytic C. botulinum spores and to obtain an appropriate representation of parameter values suitable for use in quantitative microbial risk assessment. In total, 753 D values and 436 z values were extracted from the literature and reveal significant differences in spore heat resistance properties, particularly those corresponding to recovery in the presence or absence of lysozyme. A total of 503 D and 338 z values collected for heating temperatures at or below 83°C were used to obtain a probability distribution representing variability in spore heat resistance for strains recovered in media that did not contain lysozyme. IMPORTANCE: In total, 753 D values and 436 z values extracted from literature sources reveal significant differences in spore heat resistance properties. On the basis of collected data, two z values have been identified, z = 7°C and z = 9°C, for spores recovered without and with lysozyme, respectively. The findings support the use of heat treatment at 90°C for 10 min to reduce the spore concentration by a factor of 10(6), providing that lysozyme is not present during recovery. This study indicates that greater heat treatment is required for food products containing lysozyme, and this might require consideration of alternative recommendation/guidance. In addition, the data set has been used to test hypotheses regarding the dependence of spore heat resistance on the toxin type and strain, on the heating technique used, and on the method of D value determination used.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyHot TemperatureClostridium botulinumLinear ModelsModels, BiologicalSpores, BacterialThermotolerance

Identifiers

PMID27474721
PMCPMC5038052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.