ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2016
A Comparison of Web and Telephone Responses From a National HIV and AIDS Survey.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Family immigration status and suicidal thoughts and behaviors in Latino adolescents in California.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Children Undergoing Removable Orthodontic Treatment.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Mode Effects Between Telephone and Web Interviews in the Post-COVID-19 Questionnaire Survey CoVerlauf: Exploratory Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Self-help cognitive behavioral therapy for gaze anxiety in young adults: Protocol of a 3-arms, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a Combined Text Messaging and Online Survey Protocol for Giardiasis Case Investigation - Colorado, September 2023-May 2024.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2025Article
- Temporal Trends in Public Stroke Awareness in Korea, 2009 to 2023.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Challenges to and considerations of designing cancer prevention trials.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2025Article
- Lessons Learned From a Sequential Mixed-Mode Survey Design to Recruit and Collect Data From Case-Control Study Participants: Formative Evaluation.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- The role of vaccine status homophily in the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey with modelling.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Relation between child maltreatment and human capital: results from a population-based birth cohort.Cadernos de saude publica · 2024Article
- COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Utilization of online systems to promote youth participation in research: A methodological study.World journal of methodology · 2023Article
- Does Appearance Matter during Pregnancy? A Cross-Sectional Study of Body Satisfaction from Pre-Pregnancy to Late Gestation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Prevalence of cannabis use for pain management in Quebec: A post-legalization estimate among generations living with chronic pain.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2022Article
- A web-based survey of contact lens-related adverse events among the Japanese female population.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Rural and Urban Differences in COVID-19 Prevention Behaviors.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021Article
- Applying patient-reported outcome methodology to capture patient-reported health data: Report from an NIH Collaboratory roundtable.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Is the public sweet on sugary beverages? Social desirability bias and sweetened beverage taxes.Economics and human biology · 2020Article
- Research in the Time of Coronavirus: Continuing Ongoing Studies in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic.AIDS and behavior · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResponse differences to survey questions are known to exist for different modes of questionnaire completion. Previous research has shown that response differences by mode are larger for sensitive and complicated questions. However, it is unknown what effect completion mode may have on HIV and AIDS survey research, which addresses particularly sensitive and stigmatized health issues.
objectivesWe seek to compare responses between self-selected Web and telephone respondents in terms of social desirability and item nonresponse in a national HIV and AIDS survey.
methodsA survey of 2085 people in Canada aged 18 years and older was conducted to explore public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors around HIV and AIDS in May 2011. Participants were recruited using random-digit dialing and could select to be interviewed on the telephone or self-complete through the Internet. For this paper, 15 questions considered to be either sensitive, stigma-related, or less-sensitive in nature were assessed to estimate associations between responses and mode of completion. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted for questions with significant (P≤.05) bivariate differences in responses to adjust for sociodemographic factors. As survey mode was not randomly assigned, we created a propensity score variable and included it in our multivariate models to control for mode selection bias.
resultsA total of 81% of participants completed the questionnaire through the Internet, and 19% completed by telephone. Telephone respondents were older, reported less education, had lower incomes, and were more likely from the province of Quebec. Overall, 2 of 13 questions assessed for social desirability and 3 of 15 questions assessed for item nonresponse were significantly associated with choice of mode in the multivariate analysis. For social desirability, Web respondents were more likely than telephone respondents to report more than 1 sexual partner in the past year (fully adjusted odds ratio (OR)=3.65, 95% CI 1.80-7.42) and more likely to have donated to charity in the past year (OR=1.63, 95% CI 1.15-2.29). For item nonresponse, Web respondents were more likely than telephone respondents to have a missing or "don't know" response when asked about: the disease they were most concerned about (OR=3.02, 95% CI 1.67-5.47); if they had ever been tested for HIV (OR=8.04, 95% CI 2.46-26.31); and when rating their level of comfort with shopping at grocery store if the owner was known to have HIV or AIDS (OR=3.11, 95% CI 1.47-6.63).
conclusionSociodemographic differences existed between Web and telephone respondents, but for 23 of 28 questions considered in our analysis, there were no significant differences in responses by mode. For surveys with very sensitive health content, such as HIV and AIDS, Web administration may be subject to less social desirability bias but may also have greater item nonresponse for certain questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.