Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27473580›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2017

Feelings of familiarity and false memory for specific associations resulting from mugshot exposure.

Alan W Kersten, Julie L Earles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Event Perception and Memory.Annual review of psychology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alan W KerstenDepartment of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, 33431-0991, USA. akersten@fau.edu.
Julie L EarlesDepartment of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, 33431-0991, USA.

Funding

Adult Age Differences in Binding Actors and ActionsR15AG023526 · NIA · FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY · PI KERSTEN, ALAN W · 2004 to 2004
$207k
NIA NIH HHS R15 AG023526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research reveals that mugshot viewing accompanied by questions about an action can cause young adults to associate the pictured person and the queried action, leading to later false recollection of having seen that person perform that action. In contrast, mugshot viewing in older adults can lead to vague feelings of familiarity for the pictured person, encouraging older adults to later falsely recognize the pictured person performing any familiar action. Participants viewed events involving actors performing different actions and then were asked verbal questions about which actor had performed each action, with each question accompanied by mugshots of potential "perpetrators" of the action. In a later recognition test, older adults were more likely to falsely recognize a novel conjunction of a familiar actor and action if they had seen a mugshot of that actor, regardless of whether the mugshot had accompanied a question about that action. In contrast, young adults were more likely to falsely recognize a conjunction event only if it involved an actor whose mugshot had accompanied a question about that particular action. This effect remained when the analysis was limited to trials involving actors whose mugshots had not been previously selected, implicating false recollection rather than commitment effects.

Indexed as

AssociationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingFacial RecognitionHumansMiddle AgedRecognition, PsychologyYoung AdultAgingEyewitness testimonyFalse memoryFamiliarityRecognition memoryRecollection

Identifiers

PMID27473580
PMCPMC7877503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.