Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27473375›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2016

Intensive social cognitive treatment (can do treatment) with participation of support partners in persons with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: observation of improved self-efficacy, quality of life, anxiety and depression 1 year later.

Peter Joseph Jongen, Marco Heerings, Rob Ruimschotel, Astrid Hussaarts, Lotte Duyverman, Anneke van der Zande, Joyce Valkenburg-Vissers, Maarten van Droffelaar, Wim Lemmens, Rogier Donders and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Exploring the impact of stressful life events on quality of life: meaning making and narrative reconstruction.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Pet Ownership and Multiple Sclerosis during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peter Joseph JongenDepartment of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands. p.j.h.jongen@rug.nl.
Marco HeeringsNational Multiple Sclerosis Foundation The Netherlands, Mathenesserlaan 378, 3023 HB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rob RuimschotelMedical Psychiatric Centre PsyToBe, Metroweg 50, 3083 BB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Astrid HussaartsNational Multiple Sclerosis Foundation The Netherlands, Mathenesserlaan 378, 3023 HB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lotte DuyvermanMedical Psychiatric Centre PsyToBe, Metroweg 50, 3083 BB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anneke van der ZandeNational Multiple Sclerosis Foundation The Netherlands, Mathenesserlaan 378, 3023 HB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joyce Valkenburg-VissersFysiotherapie Maaspoort, Maaspoortweg 182, 5235 KB, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Maarten van DroffelaarNational Multiple Sclerosis Foundation The Netherlands, Mathenesserlaan 378, 3023 HB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim LemmensDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rogier DondersDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Leo H VisserMultiple Sclerosis Center Midden Brabant, EZT, Location St. Elisabeth, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) self-efficacy positively affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical activity. In a previous study we observed that 6 months after an intensive 3-day social cognitive treatment (Can Do treatment) with the participation of support partners, self-efficacy and HRQoL had improved in persons with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). Given the chronic nature of the disease, it is important to know whether these beneficial changes may last.

methodsCan Do treatment was given to 60 persons with MS and their support partners. At baseline and 12 months after treatment self-efficacy control, self-efficacy function, physical and mental HRQoL, anxiety, depression and fatigue were assessed via self-report questionnaires. Differences were tested via a paired t test.

resultsOf the 57 persons with MS that completed the baseline assessment and the 3-day treatment, 38 filled in the 12th month questionnaires (response rate 66.7 %), 22 with RRMS and 14 with progressive MS. In the RR group self-efficacy control had increased by 20.2 % and physical HRQoL by 15.0 %, and depression and anxiety had decreased by 29.8 and 25.9 %, respectively (all P < 0.05); the changes in mental HRQoL (+17 %) and fatigue (-20 %) failed to be statistically significant (P = 0.087, P = 0.080, respectively). In the progressive group no changes suggestive of improvement were seen.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that a 3-day intensive social cognitive treatment (Can Do treatment) with the participation of support partners may have long lasting beneficial effects on the self-efficacy and HRQoL in persons with RRMS; and that improvements in anxiety and depression, not seen in the 6-month study, may yet develop at 12 months.

Indexed as

Psychosocial Support SystemsAdultAnxietyCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionExerciseFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyAutonomyCognitiveDepressionFatigueMultiple sclerosisParticipationQuality of lifeSelf-efficacySocial

Identifiers

PMID27473375
PMCPMC4966822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.