Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27473318›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2016

Modulatory Effects of the Ipsi and Contralateral Ventral Premotor Cortex (PMv) on the Primary Motor Cortex (M1) Outputs to Intrinsic Hand and Forearm Muscles in Cebus apella.

Stephan Quessy, Sandrine L Côté, Adjia Hamadjida, Joan Deffeyes, Numa Dancause

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04286516 (Brain Areas That Control Reaching Movements After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04286516 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Brain Areas That Control Reaching Movements After Stroke: Task-relevant Connectivity and Movement-synchronized Brain Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2020 to 2027Enrolled76ConditionsStroke, Brain Disease, Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System DiseasesArmsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Premotor cortices differentially influence contralateral motor cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sex differences in white matter tracts of capuchin monkey brains.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Rapid and Bihemispheric Reorganization of Neuronal Activity in Premotor Cortex after Brain Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Premotor Cortical-Cerebellar Reorganization in a Macaque Model of Primary Motor Cortical Lesion and Recovery.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Contrasting Modulatory Effects from the Dorsal and Ventral Premotor Cortex on Primary Motor Cortex Outputs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephan QuessyDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Sandrine L CôtéDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Adjia HamadjidaDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada Groupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central (GRSNC), Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Joan DeffeyesDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Numa DancauseDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada Groupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central (GRSNC), Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CAEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ventral premotor cortex (PMv) is a key node in the neural network involved in grasping. One way PMv can carry out this function is by modulating the outputs of the primary motor cortex (M1) to intrinsic hand and forearm muscles. As many PMv neurons discharge when grasping with either arm, both PMv within the same hemisphere (ipsilateral; iPMv) and in the opposite hemisphere (contralateral; cPMv) could modulate M1 outputs. Our objective was to compare modulatory effects of iPMv and cPMv on M1 outputs to intrinsic hand and forearm muscles. We used paired-pulse protocols with intracortical microstimulations in capuchin monkeys. A conditioning stimulus was applied in either iPMv or cPMv simultaneously or prior to a test stimulus in M1 and the effects quantified in electromyographic signals. Modulatory effects from iPMv were predominantly facilitatory, and facilitation was much more common and powerful on intrinsic hand than forearm muscles. In contrast, while the conditioning of cPMv could elicit facilitatory effects, in particular to intrinsic hand muscles, it was much more likely to inhibit M1 outputs. These data show that iPMv and cPMv have very different modulatory effects on the outputs of M1 to intrinsic hand and forearm muscles.

Indexed as

AnimalsCebusElectric StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleForearmFunctional LateralityHandMicroelectrodesMotor ActivityMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalNeural PathwaysNeuronscortical networkinteractioninterhemisphericmotor-evoked potentialstimulation

Identifiers

PMID27473318
PMCPMC5028004
OpenAlexW2480505647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.