Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27473148›Full record

ReviewJournal of nephrology2016

The role of bone biopsy for the diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy: a short overview and future perspectives.

Catarina Carvalho, Catarina Moniz Alves, João Miguel Frazão

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nephrology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bone biopsy in nephrology practice.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catarina CarvalhoInstituto de Investigação E Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Catarina Moniz AlvesInstituto de Investigação E Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
João Miguel FrazãoInstituto de Investigação E Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. jmmdfrazao@gmail.com.
Hospital Braga · PTi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients present specific bone and mineral metabolism disturbances, which account for important morbidity and mortality. The term renal osteodystrophy, classically used for the nomination of CKD-associated bone disorder, has been limited to the histologic description of bone lesions, requiring the use of bone biopsy. Biochemical markers and imaging tools do not adequately predict the complex bone changes that are observed in renal osteodystrophy. Parathyroid hormone, which is a universally used biomarker of bone turnover in clinical practice, lacks specificity and sensitivity. Therefore, tetracycline double-labelled transiliac bone biopsy, with bone histology and histomorphometric evaluation, remains the best clinical tool to discriminate bone turnover and to evaluate the other dimensions of renal osteodystrophy. This review will focus on the value of classic bone histomorphometric analysis of trabecular bone in CKD patients and unfold new perspectives of this diagnostic tool, including cortical bone evaluation and bone tissue immunohistochemistry.

Indexed as

BiopsyBiomarkersBone and BonesBone RemodelingChronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone DisorderHumansImmunohistochemistryPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersBone biopsyChronic kidney disease-related mineral and bone disease (CKD-MBD)Cortical boneImmunohistochemistryRenal osteodystrophy

Identifiers

PMID27473148
OpenAlexW2493938916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.