ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility2016
Degenerative and regenerative features of myofibers differ among skeletal muscles in a murine model of muscular dystrophy.
Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative 3D assessment of muscle dystrophy through X-ray phase-contrast tomography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anti-fibrotic, muscle-promoting antibody-drug conjugates for the improvement and treatment of DMD.iScience · 2025Article
- A Novel Minimally Invasive Surgically Induced Skeletal Muscle Injury Model in Sheep.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Skeletal muscle regeneration in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy is correlated with pathological severity.Human molecular genetics · 2020Article
- Review
- Persistent upregulation of the β-tubulin tubb6, linked to muscle regeneration, is a source of microtubule disorganization in dystrophic muscle.Human molecular genetics · 2019Article
- Specific effects of neuregulin-1β on the communication between DRG neurons and skeletal muscle cells in vitro.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal muscle myofibers constantly undergo degeneration and regeneration. Histopathological features of 6 skeletal muscles (cranial tibial [CT], gastrocnemius, quadriceps femoris, triceps brachii [TB], lumbar longissimus muscles, and costal part of the diaphragm [CPD]) were compared using C57BL/10ScSn-Dmd
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.