ArticleMedicine2016
18F-FDG uptake for prediction EGFR mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- CanBMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Impact assessment of [18F]FDG PET/CT in predicting EGFR gene mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma using recovery coefficient-based correction of semi-quantitative and volume-based PET metrics.Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Transfer learning-based PET/CT three-dimensional convolutional neural network fusion of image and clinical information for prediction of EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Subregion-specificAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- The Prognostic Value ofMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2022Article
- A Review of the Correlation Between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status andFrontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Recent and current advances in PET/CT imaging in the field of predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- PET/CT Radiomic Features: A Potential Biomarker for EGFR Mutation Status and Survival Outcome Prediction in NSCLC Patients Treated With TKIs.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Biological Significance ofInternational journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Imaging Biomarkers of Tumour Proliferation and Invasion for Personalised Lung Cancer Therapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
- Radiogenomics Based on PET Imaging.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Review
- Diagnostic and Predictive Values ofCancer management and research · 2020Article
- Value of combining PET/CT and clinicopathological features in predicting EGFR mutation in Lung Adenocarcinoma with Bone Metastasis.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Efficacy of erlotinib and celecoxib for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.Medicine · 2019Article
- Non-invasive tumor genotyping using radiogenomic biomarkers, a systematic review and oncology-wide pathway analysis.Oncotarget · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, a lack of sufficient tumor tissue has been a limitation for determining EGFR mutation status in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to predict EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients based on a model including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and clinical features.We retrospectively reviewed NSCLC patients undergoing EGFR mutation testing and pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography between March 2009 and December 2013. The relationships of EGFR mutations with both SUVmax and patient characteristics were evaluated, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. The model was assessed by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and was prospectively validated during January to June 2014.Three hundred and sixteen patients meeting the criteria were enrolled for model construction. The SUVmax values were significantly lower for EGFR mutations (mean, 9.5 ± 5.74) than for EGFR wild-type (mean, 12.7 ± 6.43; P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that the SUVmax cutoff point was 8.1, for which the AUC was 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.72). In addition, multivariate analysis also showed that low SUVmax (≤8.1) was a predictor of EGFR mutations, for which the AUC was 0.77, combining nonsmoking history and primary tumor size (≤5 cm). Eighty-five patients were enrolled to validate the predictive model, and the overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 77.6%, 64.6% (95% CI 40.7-82.8), and 82.5% (95% CI 70.9-91.0), respectively.The specific FDG uptake value could be considered to effectively predict EGFR mutation status of NSCLC patients by considering smoking history and primary tumor size when genetic tests are not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.