Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27472739›Full record

ArticleMedicine2016

18F-FDG uptake for prediction EGFR mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer.

Jian Guan, Nan J Xiao, Min Chen, Wen L Zhou, Yao W Zhang, Shuang Wang, Yong M Dai, Lu Li, Yue Zhang, Qin Y Li and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. CanBMJ open · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Subregion-specificAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  5. The Prognostic Value ofMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Biological Significance ofInternational journal of general medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Radiogenomics Based on PET Imaging.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Review
  12. Diagnostic and Predictive Values ofCancer management and research · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jian GuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology PET Center Department of Pathology Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Chronic Airways Diseases Laboratory, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Nan J Xiao
Min Chen
Wen L Zhou
Yao W Zhang
Shuang Wang
Yong M Dai
Lu Li
Yue Zhang
Qin Y Li
Xiang Z Li
Mi Yang
Hu B Wu
Long H Chen
Lai Y Liu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, a lack of sufficient tumor tissue has been a limitation for determining EGFR mutation status in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to predict EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients based on a model including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and clinical features.We retrospectively reviewed NSCLC patients undergoing EGFR mutation testing and pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography between March 2009 and December 2013. The relationships of EGFR mutations with both SUVmax and patient characteristics were evaluated, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. The model was assessed by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and was prospectively validated during January to June 2014.Three hundred and sixteen patients meeting the criteria were enrolled for model construction. The SUVmax values were significantly lower for EGFR mutations (mean, 9.5 ± 5.74) than for EGFR wild-type (mean, 12.7 ± 6.43; P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that the SUVmax cutoff point was 8.1, for which the AUC was 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.72). In addition, multivariate analysis also showed that low SUVmax (≤8.1) was a predictor of EGFR mutations, for which the AUC was 0.77, combining nonsmoking history and primary tumor size (≤5 cm). Eighty-five patients were enrolled to validate the predictive model, and the overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 77.6%, 64.6% (95% CI 40.7-82.8), and 82.5% (95% CI 70.9-91.0), respectively.The specific FDG uptake value could be considered to effectively predict EGFR mutation status of NSCLC patients by considering smoking history and primary tumor size when genetic tests are not available.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisFluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID27472739
PMCPMC5265876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.