Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27472545›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2016

Cortical activity during cued picture naming predicts individual differences in stuttering frequency.

Jeffrey R Mock, Anne L Foundas, Edward J Golob

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An active inference account of stuttering behavior.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Functional and Neuroanatomical Bases of Developmental Stuttering: Current Insights.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Single-Trial Classification of Disfluent Brain States in Adults Who Stutter.Conference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey R MockDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA. Electronic address: jmock@tulane.edu.
Anne L FoundasDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.
Edward J GolobDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.
Tulane University · US

Funding

The role of the CMV-associated reactive oxygen species in age-relatedP20GM103629 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI JAZWINSKI, S MICHAL · 2012 to 2021
$22.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDevelopmental stuttering is characterized by fluent speech punctuated by stuttering events, the frequency of which varies among individuals and contexts. Most stuttering events occur at the beginning of an utterance, suggesting neural dynamics associated with stuttering may be evident during speech preparation.

methodsThis study used EEG to measure cortical activity during speech preparation in men who stutter, and compared the EEG measures to individual differences in stuttering rate as well as to a fluent control group. Each trial contained a cue followed by an acoustic probe at one of two onset times (early or late), and then a picture. There were two conditions: a speech condition where cues induced speech preparation of the picture's name and a control condition that minimized speech preparation.

resultsAcross conditions stuttering frequency correlated to cue-related EEG beta power and auditory ERP slow waves from early onset acoustic probes.

conclusionsThe findings reveal two new cortical markers of stuttering frequency that were present in both conditions, manifest at different times, are elicited by different stimuli (visual cue, auditory probe), and have different EEG responses (beta power, ERP slow wave). SIGNIFICANCE: The cue-target paradigm evoked brain responses that correlated to pre-experimental stuttering rate.

Indexed as

CuesIndividualityAcoustic StimulationAdultCerebral CortexEvoked PotentialsHumansMalePhotic StimulationSpeechStutteringAuditory event-related potentialsEEGEvent-related desynchronizationSpeech preparationStuttering

Identifiers

PMID27472545
PMCPMC5053619
OpenAlexW2429549215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.